Critics give Rings Around the World a B-Side Breakdown of 82 (B-), from 10 reviews at outlets we track. Scores run 60 to 100.
The verdict on Rings Around the World
8 of 10 critics liked it, with some disagreement on how much.
- Highest 100 The Rolling Stone Album Guide
- Lowest 60 Q and NME
- Career #2 of Super Furry Animals's 6 albums with a Breakdown
- By the numbers Super Furry Animals's best-reviewed album here since Radiator (1997). The fourth best-reviewed Pop album of 2001 we've tracked.
| The gist | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| The Rolling Stone Album Guide via Wikipediaby Kembrew McLeod | 5/5 | 100 | 2004 | “Previously published as: Rolling Stone album guide” |
| Entertainment Weekly via Wikipediaby Rob Brunner | A- | 91 | 2002 | |
| Spin via Wikipediaby Barry Walters | 9/10 | 90 | 2002 | |
| Pitchfork via Wikipediaby Brent DiCrescenzo | 8.9/10 | 89 | 2001 | “To date, the Super Furry Animals have driven a blue, techno-blaring tank to gigs before selling it to Don Henley …” |
| Los Angeles Times via Wikipediaby Steve Hochman | 3.5/4 | 88 | 2002 | “***1/2 NORAH JONES "Come Away With Me" Blue Note Despite training in jazz, Jones has musical instincts that seem tied far more closely to a soulful, sometimes country-accented brand of…” |
| Rolling Stone via Wikipediaby Peter Relic | 4/5 | 80 | 2002 | |
| The Guardian via Wikipediaby Alexis Petridis | 4/5 | 80 | 2001 | “Super Furry Animals' songs redeem their prog-rock excesses, says Alexis Petridis” |
| AllMusic via Wikipediaby Stephen Thomas Erlewine | 4/5 | 80 | ||
| Q via Wikipediaby John Aizlewood | 3/5 | 60 | 2004 | |
| NME via Wikipediaby Ted Kessler | 6/10 | 60 | 2005 |
Every Sunday: the week's new albums, scored by the critics. Plus our own reviews when we post them. Free, and one click to leave.
Rings Around the World in Super Furry Animals's catalog
How these critics usually treat Super Furry Animals
- The Rolling Stone Album Guide Kinder than usual20 points above the other critics here. Usually 19 points below on Super Furry Animals's other albums (4).
- NME Harsher than usual24 points below the other critics here. Usually 5 points above on Super Furry Animals's other albums (5).
- Q Harsher than usual24 points below the other critics here. Usually 5 points below on Super Furry Animals's other albums (4).
- Rolling Stone Kinder than usual2 points below the other critics here. Usually 10 points below on Super Furry Animals's other albums (3).
- AllMusic About usual for them2 points below the other critics here. Usually 5 points above on Super Furry Animals's other albums (5).
- The Guardian About usual for them2 points below the other critics here. Usually 4 points below on Super Furry Animals's other albums (5).
More from Super Furry Animals
More Pop from around 2001
Would you spin it again?
Be the first to answer. Results show once 3 listeners weigh in.
How the Breakdown works
Every outlet’s score is converted to 0–100 (2/5 is 40, 5.9/10 is 59, a B+ is 88) and averaged. Grades follow the B-Side scale: A is 90–100, B 80–89, C 70–79, D 60–69, F below 60. Approval is the share of critics who scored it 75 or higher; the Breakdown shows green at 75 and up, red below. Divisiveness asks a different question: not how many critics liked it, but how close their scores are to each other. Five critics who all give it 50 are Unanimous, even though none of them liked it. The labels run Unanimous, Broad agreement, Some debate, Divided, and Contentious. Replay rate comes from listeners, not critics: yes counts fully, a few tracks counts half, no counts zero. The gist quotes each outlet’s own summary of its review. Published is the date on the review itself, read from the outlet’s page, so you can see whether an album’s reputation came at release or years later. Scores marked est. come from reviews that publish no number. Scores marked via Wikipedia are archive ratings, mostly for older albums, taken from the “Professional ratings” box on the album’s Wikipedia page (published openly through Wikidata); each links to the original review when we can find it online, and to that Wikipedia entry when we can’t. When an outlet reviewed an album twice, years apart (often for a reissue), both scores count, each labeled with its year.
A-Side marks the critics’ top tier. An album earns it automatically, from its numbers alone: a Breakdown of 90 or higher, from at least 5 reviews, with at least 75% approval. Nobody hands it out and nobody can buy it; if new reviews pull an album below the line, it loses the badge.









Leave a Reply