Guerrilla

Super Furry Animals – Guerrilla: B-Side Breakdown 77 (Keeper) from 10 critic reviews.

Album cover for Guerrilla by Super Furry Animals
Released June 7, 1999
Shop on AmazonAs an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.
Super Furry Animals

Guerrilla

77
B-Side BreakdownKeeper · 10 critics · 70% approval
B-Side Breakdown77Keeper
Approval70%7 of 10 critics scored it 70 or higher
DivisivenessSome debateHow close the scores are: most critics land within 28 points of each other

Critics give Guerrilla a B-Side Breakdown of 77 (Keeper), from 10 reviews at outlets we track. Scores run 50 to 95.

The verdict on Guerrilla

7 of 10 critics liked it. A mixed reception.

020406080100The Rolling Stone Album Guide: 50Q: 60The Independent: 60Spin: 80Select: 80The Guardian: 80AllMusic: 80Melody Maker: 90NME: 90Pitchfork: 95 Breakdown 77
The gist
Pitchfork via Wikipediaby Brent DiCrescenzo 9.5/10 95
Melody Maker via Wikipediaby Neil Neil Kulkarni 4.5/5 90 2005
NME via Wikipediaby James Oldham 9/10 90 1999
Spin via Wikipediaby Erik Himmelsbach 8/10 80 1999
Select via Wikipediaby Toby Manning 4/5 80 2005
The Guardian via Wikipediaby Caroline Sullivan 4/5 80 2005
AllMusic via Wikipediaby Denise Sullivan 4/5 80
Q via Wikipediaby Peter Kane 3/5 60 2005
The Independent via Wikipediaby Tim Perry 3/5 60 1999 “Various 'Soundbombing 2' (Rawkus)”
The Rolling Stone Album Guide via Wikipediaby Kembrew McLeod 2.5/5 50 2004 “Previously published as: Rolling Stone album guide”

Guerrilla in Super Furry Animals's catalog

70Fuzzy Logic (1996): 8080Radiator (1997): 8484Guerrilla (1999): 7777This oneMwng (2000): 7777Rings Around the World (2001): 8181Phantom Power (2003): 7878Love Kraft (2005): 8181Hey Venus! (2007): 767619962007
Super Furry Animals's albums by B-Side Breakdown, in release order. Above the dashed line, most critics liked it. Every Super Furry Animals album, ranked

How these critics usually treat Super Furry Animals

  • The Rolling Stone Album Guide Harsher than usual29 points below the other critics here. Usually 4 points below on Super Furry Animals's other albums (5).
  • Pitchfork Kinder than usual21 points above the other critics here. Usually 6 points above on Super Furry Animals's other albums (7).
  • NME Kinder than usual15 points above the other critics here. Usually 1 point above on Super Furry Animals's other albums (7).
  • Q Harsher than usual18 points below the other critics here. Usually 6 points below on Super Furry Animals's other albums (6).
  • The Guardian Kinder than usual4 points above the other critics here. Usually 6 points below on Super Furry Animals's other albums (7).
  • AllMusic About usual for them4 points above the other critics here. Usually 5 points above on Super Furry Animals's other albums (7).

More from Super Furry Animals

See all Super Furry Animals albums ranked

More Pop from around 1999

Would you spin it again?

Be the first to answer. Results show once 3 listeners weigh in.

How the Breakdown works

Every outlet’s score is converted to 0–100 (2/5 is 40, 5.9/10 is 59) and averaged. A letter grade counts as the star rating it matches across thousands of reviews of the same albums, so a B+ is 75, like four stars, and a B is 65. Verdicts: Heavy Rotation is 85 and up, Keeper 70–84, Mixed Bag 55–69, Back of the Crate below 55. Approval is the share of critics who scored it 70 or higher (7/10, three and a half stars); the Breakdown shows green at 70 and up, red below. Divisiveness asks a different question: not how many critics liked it, but how close their scores are to each other. Five critics who all give it 50 are Unanimous, even though none of them liked it. The labels run Unanimous, Broad agreement, Some debate, Divided, and Contentious. Replay rate comes from listeners, not critics: yes counts fully, a few tracks counts half, no counts zero. The gist quotes each outlet’s own summary of its review. Published is the date on the review itself, read from the outlet’s page, so you can see whether an album’s reputation came at release or years later. Scores marked est. come from reviews that publish no number. Scores marked via Wikipedia are archive ratings, mostly for older albums, taken from the “Professional ratings” box on the album’s Wikipedia page (published openly through Wikidata); each links to the original review when we can find it online, and to that Wikipedia entry when we can’t. When an outlet reviewed an album twice, years apart (often for a reissue), both scores count, each labeled with its year.

A-Side marks the critics’ top tier. An album earns it automatically, from its numbers alone: a Breakdown of 90 or higher, from at least 5 reviews, with at least 75% approval. Nobody hands it out and nobody can buy it; if new reviews pull an album below the line, it loses the badge.

Report a problem

Tags:

Leave a Reply