Hey Venus!

Super Furry Animals – Hey Venus!: B-Side Breakdown 78 (C+) from 9 critic reviews.

Album cover for Hey Venus! by Super Furry Animals
Released August 27, 2007
Shop on AmazonAs an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.
Super Furry Animals

Hey Venus!

78
B-Side BreakdownGrade C+ · 9 critics · 78% approval
B-Side Breakdown78Grade: C+
Approval78%7 of 9 critics scored it 75 or higher
DivisivenessSome debateHow close the scores are: most critics land within 22 points of each other

Critics give Hey Venus! a B-Side Breakdown of 78 (C+), from 9 reviews at outlets we track. Scores run 60 to 95.

The verdict on Hey Venus!

7 of 9 critics liked it, with some disagreement on how much.

020406080100Uncut: 60Q: 60Pitchfork: 78musicOMH: 80NME: 80The Guardian: 80Stylus Magazine: 81AllMusic: 90The A.V. Club: 95 Breakdown 78
The gist
The A.V. Club via Wikipediaby Chris Mincher A 95 2008 “Super Furry Animals: Hey Venus!”
AllMusic via Wikipediaby Stephen Thomas Erlewine 4.5/5 90 2007
Stylus Magazine via Wikipedia B- 81 2007
musicOMH via Wikipediaby David Welsh 4/5 80 2007 “Love Kraft was excellent. Climactic. It was the sound of an accomplished and imaginative band reaching the gates of prog pop heaven and crashing through.”
NME via Wikipedia 8/10 80 2007 “The gut feeling, on hearing ‘Let The Wolves Howl At The Moon’, the closer of the eighth studio album by Super Furry Animals, is one of disappointment. But before the…”
The Guardian via Wikipediaby Betty Clarke 4/5 80 2007
Pitchfork via Wikipediaby Marc Hogan 7.8/10 78 2007
Uncut via Wikipediaby Piers Martin 3/5 60 2007
Q via Wikipediaby Rob Fearn 3/5 60 2007

Hey Venus! in Super Furry Animals's catalog

75Fuzzy Logic (1996): 8080Radiator (1997): 8484Guerrilla (1999): 7777Mwng (2000): 7777Rings Around the World (2001): 8282Phantom Power (2003): 8080Love Kraft (2005): 8181Hey Venus! (2007): 7878This one1996
Super Furry Animals's albums by B-Side Breakdown, in release order. Above the dashed line, most critics liked it. Every Super Furry Animals album, ranked

How these critics usually treat Super Furry Animals

  • Uncut Harsher than usual21 points below the other critics here. Usually 9 points above on Super Furry Animals's other albums (3).
  • Q Harsher than usual21 points below the other critics here. Usually 7 points below on Super Furry Animals's other albums (6).
  • AllMusic Kinder than usual13 points above the other critics here. Usually 3 points above on Super Furry Animals's other albums (7).
  • The Guardian Kinder than usual2 points above the other critics here. Usually 6 points below on Super Furry Animals's other albums (7).
  • Pitchfork About usual for themLevel with the other critics here. Usually 8 points above on Super Furry Animals's other albums (7).
  • NME About usual for them2 points above the other critics here. Usually 2 points above on Super Furry Animals's other albums (7).

More from Super Furry Animals

See all Super Furry Animals albums ranked

More Rock from around 2007

Would you spin it again?

Be the first to answer. Results show once 3 listeners weigh in.

How the Breakdown works

Every outlet’s score is converted to 0–100 (2/5 is 40, 5.9/10 is 59, a B+ is 88) and averaged. Grades follow the B-Side scale: A is 90–100, B 80–89, C 70–79, D 60–69, F below 60. Approval is the share of critics who scored it 75 or higher; the Breakdown shows green at 75 and up, red below. Divisiveness asks a different question: not how many critics liked it, but how close their scores are to each other. Five critics who all give it 50 are Unanimous, even though none of them liked it. The labels run Unanimous, Broad agreement, Some debate, Divided, and Contentious. Replay rate comes from listeners, not critics: yes counts fully, a few tracks counts half, no counts zero. The gist quotes each outlet’s own summary of its review. Published is the date on the review itself, read from the outlet’s page, so you can see whether an album’s reputation came at release or years later. Scores marked est. come from reviews that publish no number. Scores marked via Wikipedia are archive ratings, mostly for older albums, taken from the “Professional ratings” box on the album’s Wikipedia page (published openly through Wikidata); each links to the original review when we can find it online, and to that Wikipedia entry when we can’t. When an outlet reviewed an album twice, years apart (often for a reissue), both scores count, each labeled with its year.

A-Side marks the critics’ top tier. An album earns it automatically, from its numbers alone: a Breakdown of 90 or higher, from at least 5 reviews, with at least 75% approval. Nobody hands it out and nobody can buy it; if new reviews pull an album below the line, it loses the badge.

Report a problem


Discover more from B-Side Guys

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

Tags:

Leave a Reply