Critics give Want Two a B-Side Breakdown of 82 (B-), from 10 reviews at outlets we track. Scores run 60 to 100.
The verdict on Want Two
9 of 10 critics liked it, and they mostly agree.
- Highest 100 Los Angeles Times
- Outlier 60 Pitchfork, 20 points below the next-lowest score
- By the numbers The best-reviewed album of Rufus Wainwright's career on B-Side Breakdowns, ahead of Poses (79). The second best-reviewed Pop album of 2004 we've tracked.
| The gist | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Los Angeles Times via Wikipediaby Robert Hilburn | 4/4 | 100 | 2004 | “Rufus Wainwright "Want Two" (DreamWorks/Geffen) **** Recorded at the same time as his engrossing 2003 album, "Want One," the 12 songs in this collection were left off that album because…” |
| NME via Wikipediaby Julian Marshall | 9/10 | 90 | 2005 | |
| Entertainment Weekly via Wikipediaby David Browne | B | 85 | 2004 | |
| Robert Christgau via Wikipediaby Robert Christgau | B- | 81 | 2005 | |
| Spin via Wikipediaby Jon Caramanica | B- | 81 | 2005 | |
| Rolling Stone via Wikipediaby Barry Walters | 4/5 | 80 | 2004 | |
| Q via Wikipedia | 4/5 | 80 | 2004 | |
| The Guardian via Wikipediaby Alexis Petridis | 4/5 | 80 | 2005 | |
| AllMusic via Wikipediaby Matt Collar | 4/5 | 80 | ||
| Pitchfork via Wikipediaby Stephen M. Deusner | 6.0/10 | 60 | 2004 | “This is the second entry in Rufus Wainwright's Want series, which pairs his dreamy voice and droll lyrics to audaciously over-the-top orchestration.” |
Every Sunday: the week's new albums, scored by the critics. Plus our own reviews when we post them. Free, and one click to leave.
More from Rufus Wainwright
More Pop from around 2004
Would you spin it again?
Be the first to answer. Results show once 3 listeners weigh in.
How the Breakdown works
Every outlet’s score is converted to 0–100 (2/5 is 40, 5.9/10 is 59, a B+ is 88) and averaged. Grades follow the B-Side scale: A is 90–100, B 80–89, C 70–79, D 60–69, F below 60. Approval is the share of critics who scored it 75 or higher; the Breakdown shows green at 75 and up, red below. Divisiveness asks a different question: not how many critics liked it, but how close their scores are to each other. Five critics who all give it 50 are Unanimous, even though none of them liked it. The labels run Unanimous, Broad agreement, Some debate, Divided, and Contentious. Replay rate comes from listeners, not critics: yes counts fully, a few tracks counts half, no counts zero. The gist quotes each outlet’s own summary of its review. Published is the date on the review itself, read from the outlet’s page, so you can see whether an album’s reputation came at release or years later. Scores marked est. come from reviews that publish no number. Scores marked via Wikipedia are archive ratings, mostly for older albums, taken from the “Professional ratings” box on the album’s Wikipedia page (published openly through Wikidata); each links to the original review when we can find it online, and to that Wikipedia entry when we can’t. When an outlet reviewed an album twice, years apart (often for a reissue), both scores count, each labeled with its year.
A-Side marks the critics’ top tier. An album earns it automatically, from its numbers alone: a Breakdown of 90 or higher, from at least 5 reviews, with at least 75% approval. Nobody hands it out and nobody can buy it; if new reviews pull an album below the line, it loses the badge.









Leave a Reply