Critics give The Great Destroyer a B-Side Breakdown of 77 (C+), from 10 reviews at outlets we track. Scores run 55 to 91.
The verdict on The Great Destroyer
7 of 10 critics liked it. A mixed reception.
- Highest 91 Spin and Entertainment Weekly
- Lowest 55 Pitchfork
- Career Tied for #9 of Low's 13 albums with a Breakdown
| The gist | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Spin via Wikipediaby Peter S. Scholtes | A- | 91 | 2005 | |
| Entertainment Weekly via Wikipediaby Steven Chen | A- | 91 | 2006 | |
| NME via Wikipedia | 8/10 | 80 | 2006 | |
| Mojo via Wikipedia | 4/5 | 80 | 2006 | |
| The Guardian via Wikipediaby David Peschek | 4/5 | 80 | 2005 | |
| Blender via Wikipediaby Douglas Wolk | 4/5 | 80 | 2005 | |
| AllMusic via Wikipediaby Heather Phares | 4/5 | 80 | ||
| Rolling Stone via Wikipediaby David Fricke | 3.5/5 | 70 | 2005 | |
| Q via Wikipedia | 3/5 | 60 | 2006 | |
| Pitchfork via Wikipediaby David Raposa | 5.5/10 | 55 | 2005 | “For their Dave Fridmann-produced Sub Pop debut, veteran slowcore band Low expand their palette, but achieve varying degrees of success.” |
Every Sunday: the week's new albums, scored by the critics. Plus our own reviews when we post them. Free, and one click to leave.
The Great Destroyer in Low's catalog
How these critics usually treat Low
- Pitchfork Harsher than usual24 points below the other critics here. Usually level with the others on Low's other albums (11).
- Spin Kinder than usual16 points above the other critics here. Usually 3 points below on Low's other albums (5).
- Q Harsher than usual19 points below the other critics here. Usually level with the others on Low's other albums (8).
- NME Kinder than usual4 points above the other critics here. Usually 7 points below on Low's other albums (8).
- AllMusic About usual for them4 points above the other critics here. Usually 1 point below on Low's other albums (12).
- Mojo About usual for them4 points above the other critics here. Usually level with the others on Low's other albums (7).
More from Low
More Indie & Alternative from around 2004
Would you spin it again?
Be the first to answer. Results show once 3 listeners weigh in.
How the Breakdown works
Every outlet’s score is converted to 0–100 (2/5 is 40, 5.9/10 is 59, a B+ is 88) and averaged. Grades follow the B-Side scale: A is 90–100, B 80–89, C 70–79, D 60–69, F below 60. Approval is the share of critics who scored it 75 or higher; the Breakdown shows green at 75 and up, red below. Divisiveness asks a different question: not how many critics liked it, but how close their scores are to each other. Five critics who all give it 50 are Unanimous, even though none of them liked it. The labels run Unanimous, Broad agreement, Some debate, Divided, and Contentious. Replay rate comes from listeners, not critics: yes counts fully, a few tracks counts half, no counts zero. The gist quotes each outlet’s own summary of its review. Published is the date on the review itself, read from the outlet’s page, so you can see whether an album’s reputation came at release or years later. Scores marked est. come from reviews that publish no number. Scores marked via Wikipedia are archive ratings, mostly for older albums, taken from the “Professional ratings” box on the album’s Wikipedia page (published openly through Wikidata); each links to the original review when we can find it online, and to that Wikipedia entry when we can’t. When an outlet reviewed an album twice, years apart (often for a reissue), both scores count, each labeled with its year.
A-Side marks the critics’ top tier. An album earns it automatically, from its numbers alone: a Breakdown of 90 or higher, from at least 5 reviews, with at least 75% approval. Nobody hands it out and nobody can buy it; if new reviews pull an album below the line, it loses the badge.










Leave a Reply