Early reviews. Critics give Secret Name an early B-Side Breakdown of 78 (C+), from 7 reviews so far. It will settle as more outlets weigh in.
The verdict on Secret Name
Most critics weren't won over: 5 of 7 liked it.
- Outlier 100 Mojo, 20 points above the next-highest score
- Lowest 60 Encyclopedia of Popular Music
- Career #8 of Low's 13 albums with a Breakdown
| Mojo via Wikipediaby Victoria Segal | 5/5 | 100 | 2021 |
| Q via Wikipediaby Stuart Maconie | 4/5 | 80 | 1999 |
| NME via Wikipediaby John Mulvey | 8/10 | 80 | 1999 |
| AllMusic via Wikipediaby Denise Sullivan | 4/5 | 80 | |
| Pitchfork via Wikipediaby Ryan Schreiber | 7.6/10 | 76 | 1999 |
| PopMatters via Wikipedia | 7/10 | 70 | 2000 |
| Encyclopedia of Popular Music via Wikipediaby Colin Larkin | 3/5 | 60 | 2006 |
Every Sunday: the week's new albums, scored by the critics. Plus our own reviews when we post them. Free, and one click to leave.
Secret Name in Low's catalog
How these critics usually treat Low
- Mojo Kinder than usual26 points above the other critics here. Usually 4 points below on Low's other albums (7).
- NME Kinder than usual2 points above the other critics here. Usually 7 points below on Low's other albums (8).
- PopMatters About usual for them9 points below the other critics here. Usually 3 points below on Low's other albums (3).
- Q About usual for them2 points above the other critics here. Usually 3 points below on Low's other albums (8).
- AllMusic About usual for them2 points above the other critics here. Usually 1 point below on Low's other albums (12).
- Pitchfork About usual for them2 points below the other critics here. Usually 2 points below on Low's other albums (11).
More from Low
← Earlier The Curtain Hits the Cast (1996)Later → Things We Lost in the Fire (2001)
More Indie & Alternative from around 1999
Would you spin it again?
Be the first to answer. Results show once 3 listeners weigh in.
How the Breakdown works
Every outlet’s score is converted to 0–100 (2/5 is 40, 5.9/10 is 59, a B+ is 88) and averaged. Grades follow the B-Side scale: A is 90–100, B 80–89, C 70–79, D 60–69, F below 60. Approval is the share of critics who scored it 75 or higher; the Breakdown shows green at 75 and up, red below. Divisiveness asks a different question: not how many critics liked it, but how close their scores are to each other. Five critics who all give it 50 are Unanimous, even though none of them liked it. The labels run Unanimous, Broad agreement, Some debate, Divided, and Contentious. Replay rate comes from listeners, not critics: yes counts fully, a few tracks counts half, no counts zero. The gist quotes each outlet’s own summary of its review. Published is the date on the review itself, read from the outlet’s page, so you can see whether an album’s reputation came at release or years later. Scores marked est. come from reviews that publish no number. Scores marked via Wikipedia are archive ratings, mostly for older albums, taken from the “Professional ratings” box on the album’s Wikipedia page (published openly through Wikidata); each links to the original review when we can find it online, and to that Wikipedia entry when we can’t. When an outlet reviewed an album twice, years apart (often for a reissue), both scores count, each labeled with its year.
A-Side marks the critics’ top tier. An album earns it automatically, from its numbers alone: a Breakdown of 90 or higher, from at least 5 reviews, with at least 75% approval. Nobody hands it out and nobody can buy it; if new reviews pull an album below the line, it loses the badge.









Leave a Reply