I Could Live in Hope

Low – I Could Live in Hope: B-Side Breakdown 82 (B-) from 7 critic reviews.

Album cover for I Could Live in Hope by Low
Released February 18, 1994
Shop on AmazonAs an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.
Low

I Could Live in Hope

82
B-Side BreakdownGrade B- · 7 critics · 86% approval
B-Side Breakdown82Grade: B-
Approval86%6 of 7 critics scored it 75 or higher
DivisivenessBroad agreementHow close the scores are: most critics land within 14 points of each other

Early reviews. Critics give I Could Live in Hope an early B-Side Breakdown of 82 (B-), from 7 reviews so far. It will settle as more outlets weigh in.

The verdict on I Could Live in Hope

6 of 7 critics liked it, and they mostly agree.

  • Highest 93 Pitchfork
  • Lowest 70 NME
  • By the numbers The best-reviewed album of Low's career on B-Side Breakdowns, ahead of Long Division (80). The fifth best-reviewed Indie & Alternative album of 1994 we've tracked.
020406080100NME: 70Q: 80Uncut: 80Mojo: 80AllMusic: 80Chicago Tribune: 88Pitchfork: 93 Breakdown 82
The gist
Pitchfork via Wikipediaby Mark Richardson 9.3/10 93 Mar 15, 2026
Chicago Tribune via Wikipediaby Greg Kot 3.5/4 88 1994 “Low I Could Live in Hope (Vernon Yard) (STAR)(STAR)(STAR) 1/2 Mood music for shut-ins, or the best record made for those dreary, nothing’s-going-on-and-I-want-to-crawl-into-a-hole afternoons since Galaxie 500’s debut. Like…”
Q via Wikipediaby Martin Aston 4/5 80 2006
Uncut via Wikipediaby Graeme Thomson 8/10 80 2006
Mojo via Wikipediaby Victoria Segal 4/5 80 2006
AllMusic via Wikipediaby Ken Taylor 4/5 80
NME via Wikipediaby Ian Fortnam 7/10 70 2006

More from Low

See all Low albums ranked

More Indie & Alternative from around 1994

Would you spin it again?

Be the first to answer. Results show once 3 listeners weigh in.

How the Breakdown works

Every outlet’s score is converted to 0–100 (2/5 is 40, 5.9/10 is 59, a B+ is 88) and averaged. Grades follow the B-Side scale: A is 90–100, B 80–89, C 70–79, D 60–69, F below 60. Approval is the share of critics who scored it 75 or higher; the Breakdown shows green at 75 and up, red below. Divisiveness asks a different question: not how many critics liked it, but how close their scores are to each other. Five critics who all give it 50 are Unanimous, even though none of them liked it. The labels run Unanimous, Broad agreement, Some debate, Divided, and Contentious. Replay rate comes from listeners, not critics: yes counts fully, a few tracks counts half, no counts zero. The gist quotes each outlet’s own summary of its review. Published is the date on the review itself, read from the outlet’s page, so you can see whether an album’s reputation came at release or years later. Scores marked est. come from reviews that publish no number. Scores marked via Wikipedia are archive ratings, mostly for older albums, taken from the “Professional ratings” box on the album’s Wikipedia page (published openly through Wikidata); each links to the original review when we can find it online, and to that Wikipedia entry when we can’t. When an outlet reviewed an album twice, years apart (often for a reissue), both scores count, each labeled with its year.

A-Side marks the critics’ top tier. An album earns it automatically, from its numbers alone: a Breakdown of 90 or higher, from at least 5 reviews, with at least 75% approval. Nobody hands it out and nobody can buy it; if new reviews pull an album below the line, it loses the badge.

Report a problem

Tags:

Leave a Reply