Critics give Lost Themes II a B-Side Breakdown of 72 (C-), from 9 reviews at outlets we track. Scores run 56 to 90.
The verdict on Lost Themes II
4 of 9 critics liked it. A mixed reception.
- Highest 90 Sputnikmusic
- Lowest 56 Pitchfork
- Career #3 of John Carpenter's 3 albums with a Breakdown
| The gist | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sputnikmusic via Wikipediaby Simon K | 4.5/5 | 90 | 2016 | “John Carpenter – Lost Themes II review: Lost Themes II fills in the cracks and offers a much tighter album.” |
| Consequence via Wikipediaby Michael Roffman | B | 85 | 2016 | “The Master of Horror returns with another collection of sounds screaming for celluloid.” |
| Record Collector via Wikipediaby Sue Matiz | 4/5 | 80 | 2016 | “Having earned himself a reputation as The Master Of Horror and become widely revered for his iconic soundtracks, these days John Carpenter is enjoying” |
| AllMusic via Wikipedia | 4/5 | 80 | ||
| musicOMH via Wikipediaby Sam Shepherd | 3.5/5 | 70 | 2016 | “As anyone with a even passing interest in cinema will know, John Carpenter made some of the most highly regarded, and enjoyed movies of the late '70s and” |
| Exclaim! via Wikipediaby Ian Rodgers | 7/10 | 70 | 2016 | |
| Uncut via Wikipedia | 6/10 | 60 | 2016 | |
| Mojo via Wikipedia | 3/5 | 60 | 2016 | |
| Pitchfork via Wikipediaby Kevin Lozano | 5.6/10 | 56 | 2016 | “The legendary filmmaker and soundtrack composer John Carpenter began releasing standalone albums last year with Lost Themes. The followup is a reminder that the man was not known for sequels.” |
Every Sunday: the week's new albums, scored by the critics. Plus our own reviews when we post them. Free, and one click to leave.
Lost Themes II in John Carpenter's catalog
More from John Carpenter
More Electronic from around 2016
Would you spin it again?
Be the first to answer. Results show once 3 listeners weigh in.
How the Breakdown works
Every outlet’s score is converted to 0–100 (2/5 is 40, 5.9/10 is 59, a B+ is 88) and averaged. Grades follow the B-Side scale: A is 90–100, B 80–89, C 70–79, D 60–69, F below 60. Approval is the share of critics who scored it 75 or higher; the Breakdown shows green at 75 and up, red below. Divisiveness asks a different question: not how many critics liked it, but how close their scores are to each other. Five critics who all give it 50 are Unanimous, even though none of them liked it. The labels run Unanimous, Broad agreement, Some debate, Divided, and Contentious. Replay rate comes from listeners, not critics: yes counts fully, a few tracks counts half, no counts zero. The gist quotes each outlet’s own summary of its review. Published is the date on the review itself, read from the outlet’s page, so you can see whether an album’s reputation came at release or years later. Scores marked est. come from reviews that publish no number. Scores marked via Wikipedia are archive ratings, mostly for older albums, taken from the “Professional ratings” box on the album’s Wikipedia page (published openly through Wikidata); each links to the original review when we can find it online, and to that Wikipedia entry when we can’t. When an outlet reviewed an album twice, years apart (often for a reissue), both scores count, each labeled with its year.
A-Side marks the critics’ top tier. An album earns it automatically, from its numbers alone: a Breakdown of 90 or higher, from at least 5 reviews, with at least 75% approval. Nobody hands it out and nobody can buy it; if new reviews pull an album below the line, it loses the badge.






Leave a Reply