Critics give Lost Themes III: Alive After Death a B-Side Breakdown of 74 (C), from 10 reviews at outlets we track. Scores run 61 to 88.
The verdict on Lost Themes III: Alive After Death
4 of 10 critics liked it. A mixed reception.
- Highest 88 Consequence
- Lowest 61 Pitchfork
- Career #2 of John Carpenter's 3 albums with a Breakdown
- By the numbers John Carpenter's best-reviewed album here since Anthology: Movie Themes 1974-1998 (2017).
| The gist | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Consequence via Wikipediaby Michael Roffman | B+ | 88 | 2021 | “The Master of Horror returns with a six-string edge.” |
| Kerrang! via Wikipediaby Olly Thomas | 4/5 | 80 | 2021 | |
| Louder via Wikipediaby Dom Lawson | 4/5 | 80 | 2021 | “Halloween director and synthwave inspiration John Carpenter serves up immersive chills on new album Lost Themes III: Alive After Death” |
| AllMusic via Wikipediaby Heather Phares | 4/5 | 80 | ||
| Uncut via Wikipedia | 7/10 | 70 | 2021 | |
| Rolling Stone via Wikipediaby Kory Grow | 3.5/5 | 70 | 2021 | “John Carpenter's new album, 'Lost Themes III: Alive After Death,' reviewed by Rolling Stone.” |
| musicOMH via Wikipediaby Matt Cotsell | 3.5/5 | 70 | 2021 | “Another hyper polished and gratifyingly nimble selection of intimidating '80s maximalist electro that's exactly what we've come to expect” |
| Exclaim! via Wikipediaby Luke Pearson | 7/10 | 70 | 2021 | |
| Clash via Wikipedia | 7/10 | 70 | 2021 | “Sadly it’s been a good while since we’ve seen horror maestro John Carpenter behind the camera, but luckily he’s had something of a” |
| Pitchfork via Wikipediaby Nadine Smith | 6.1/10 | 61 | 2021 |
Every Sunday: the week's new albums, scored by the critics. Plus our own reviews when we post them. Free, and one click to leave.
Lost Themes III: Alive After Death in John Carpenter's catalog
More from John Carpenter
More Electronic from around 2021
Would you spin it again?
Be the first to answer. Results show once 3 listeners weigh in.
How the Breakdown works
Every outlet’s score is converted to 0–100 (2/5 is 40, 5.9/10 is 59, a B+ is 88) and averaged. Grades follow the B-Side scale: A is 90–100, B 80–89, C 70–79, D 60–69, F below 60. Approval is the share of critics who scored it 75 or higher; the Breakdown shows green at 75 and up, red below. Divisiveness asks a different question: not how many critics liked it, but how close their scores are to each other. Five critics who all give it 50 are Unanimous, even though none of them liked it. The labels run Unanimous, Broad agreement, Some debate, Divided, and Contentious. Replay rate comes from listeners, not critics: yes counts fully, a few tracks counts half, no counts zero. The gist quotes each outlet’s own summary of its review. Published is the date on the review itself, read from the outlet’s page, so you can see whether an album’s reputation came at release or years later. Scores marked est. come from reviews that publish no number. Scores marked via Wikipedia are archive ratings, mostly for older albums, taken from the “Professional ratings” box on the album’s Wikipedia page (published openly through Wikidata); each links to the original review when we can find it online, and to that Wikipedia entry when we can’t. When an outlet reviewed an album twice, years apart (often for a reissue), both scores count, each labeled with its year.
A-Side marks the critics’ top tier. An album earns it automatically, from its numbers alone: a Breakdown of 90 or higher, from at least 5 reviews, with at least 75% approval. Nobody hands it out and nobody can buy it; if new reviews pull an album below the line, it loses the badge.






Leave a Reply