Early reviews. Critics give Anthology: Movie Themes 1974-1998 an early B-Side Breakdown of 80 (B-), from 3 reviews so far. It will settle as more outlets weigh in.
The verdict on Anthology: Movie Themes 1974-1998
So far, 3 of 3 critics liked it.
- Highest 80 musicOMH, Record Collector and Pitchfork
- By the numbers The best-reviewed album of John Carpenter's career on B-Side Breakdowns, ahead of Lost Themes III: Alive After Death (74).
| The gist | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| musicOMHby Sam Shepherd | 4/5 | 80 | 2017 | “The influence of John Carpenter’s movies is undeniable. Halloween wouldn’t be Halloween without Halloween for example, and the exploits of Michael Myers” |
| Record Collectorby Sue Matiz | 4/5 | 80 | 2017 | “From It Follows to Stranger Things, synth scoring’s debt to maverick director/composer John Carpenter is incalculable. Six years after his last movie,” |
| Pitchforkby Calum Marsh | 8/10 | 80 | 2017 | “New recordings of the horror auteur’s iconic film themes, from Halloween to Assault on Precinct 13 and beyond, highlight his influential approach to music.” |
Every Sunday: the week's new albums, scored by the critics. Plus our own reviews when we post them. Free, and one click to leave.
Anthology: Movie Themes 1974-1998 in John Carpenter's catalog
More from John Carpenter
← Earlier Lost Themes II (2016)Later → Lost Themes III: Alive After Death (2021)
More Indie & Alternative from around 2017
Would you spin it again?
Be the first to answer. Results show once 3 listeners weigh in.
How the Breakdown works
Every outlet’s score is converted to 0–100 (2/5 is 40, 5.9/10 is 59, a B+ is 88) and averaged. Grades follow the B-Side scale: A is 90–100, B 80–89, C 70–79, D 60–69, F below 60. Approval is the share of critics who scored it 75 or higher; the Breakdown shows green at 75 and up, red below. Divisiveness asks a different question: not how many critics liked it, but how close their scores are to each other. Five critics who all give it 50 are Unanimous, even though none of them liked it. The labels run Unanimous, Broad agreement, Some debate, Divided, and Contentious. Replay rate comes from listeners, not critics: yes counts fully, a few tracks counts half, no counts zero. The gist quotes each outlet’s own summary of its review. Published is the date on the review itself, read from the outlet’s page, so you can see whether an album’s reputation came at release or years later. Scores marked est. come from reviews that publish no number. Scores marked via Wikipedia are archive ratings, mostly for older albums, taken from the “Professional ratings” box on the album’s Wikipedia page (published openly through Wikidata); each links to the original review when we can find it online, and to that Wikipedia entry when we can’t. When an outlet reviewed an album twice, years apart (often for a reissue), both scores count, each labeled with its year.
A-Side marks the critics’ top tier. An album earns it automatically, from its numbers alone: a Breakdown of 90 or higher, from at least 5 reviews, with at least 75% approval. Nobody hands it out and nobody can buy it; if new reviews pull an album below the line, it loses the badge.






Leave a Reply