English Settlement

XTC – English Settlement: B-Side Breakdown 71 (Keeper) from 8 critic reviews.

Album cover for English Settlement by XTC
Released February 12, 1982
Shop on AmazonAs an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.
XTC

English Settlement

71
B-Side BreakdownKeeper · 8 critics · 63% approval
B-Side Breakdown71Keeper
Approval63%5 of 8 critics scored it 70 or higher
DivisivenessDividedHow close the scores are: most critics land within 34 points of each other

Critics give English Settlement a B-Side Breakdown of 71 (Keeper), from 8 reviews at outlets we track. Scores run 40 to 100.

The verdict on English Settlement

Critics split on this one: 5 of 8 liked it.

020406080100The Rolling Stone Album Guide: 40Encyclopedia of Popular Music: 60Rolling Stone: 60Chicago Tribune: 75Robert Christgau: 75Q: 80AllMusic: 80Pitchfork: 100 Breakdown 71
The gist
Pitchfork via Wikipediaby Chris Dahlen 10/10 100 2002
Q via Wikipediaby Andrew Harrison 4/5 80
AllMusic via Wikipediaby Chris Woodstra 4/5 80
Chicago Tribune via Wikipediaby Greg Kot 3/4 75 1992 “XTC emerged as a quirky new wave band on the pithy White Music (1977, (STAR)(STAR)(STAR)). Go 2 (1978, (STAR)(STAR) 1/2) continues in the same adrenalized, adenoidal vein without the peaks…”
Robert Christgau via Wikipediaby Robert Christgau B+ 75
Encyclopedia of Popular Music via Wikipediaby Colin Larkin 3/5 60 2005
Rolling Stone via Wikipediaby Parke Puterbaugh 3/5 60
The Rolling Stone Album Guide via Wikipediaby Sasha Frere-Jones 2/5 40 2004 “Previously published as: Rolling Stone album guide”

English Settlement in XTC's catalog

70White Music (1978): 67Go 2 (1978): 57Drums and Wires (1979): 86Black Sea (1980): 82English Settlement (1982): 7171This oneMummer (1983): 57The Big Express (1984): 6825 O’Clock (1985): 89Skylarking (1986): 95Psonic Psunspot (1987): 84Oranges & Lemons (1989): 76Nonsuch (1992): 78Apple Venus Volume 1 (1999): 80Wasp Star (2000): 7019782000
XTC's albums by B-Side Breakdown, in release order. Above the dashed line, most critics liked it. Every XTC album, ranked

How these critics usually treat XTC

  • Pitchfork Kinder than usual33 points above the other critics here. Usually 3 points above on XTC's other albums (7).
  • The Rolling Stone Album Guide Harsher than usual36 points below the other critics here. Usually 7 points below on XTC's other albums (8).
  • Encyclopedia of Popular Music Harsher than usual13 points below the other critics here. Usually 7 points above on XTC's other albums (7).
  • Q Kinder than usual10 points above the other critics here. Usually 8 points below on XTC's other albums (10).
  • Robert Christgau Kinder than usual4 points above the other critics here. Usually 5 points below on XTC's other albums (9).
  • AllMusic Kinder than usual10 points above the other critics here. Usually 1 point above on XTC's other albums (12).

More from XTC

See all XTC albums ranked

More Indie & Alternative from around 1982

Would you spin it again?

Be the first to answer. Results show once 3 listeners weigh in.

How the Breakdown works

Every outlet’s score is converted to 0–100 (2/5 is 40, 5.9/10 is 59) and averaged. A letter grade counts as the star rating it matches across thousands of reviews of the same albums, so a B+ is 75, like four stars, and a B is 65. Verdicts: Heavy Rotation is 85 and up, Keeper 70–84, Mixed Bag 55–69, Back of the Crate below 55. Approval is the share of critics who scored it 70 or higher (7/10, three and a half stars); the Breakdown shows green at 70 and up, red below. Divisiveness asks a different question: not how many critics liked it, but how close their scores are to each other. Five critics who all give it 50 are Unanimous, even though none of them liked it. The labels run Unanimous, Broad agreement, Some debate, Divided, and Contentious. Replay rate comes from listeners, not critics: yes counts fully, a few tracks counts half, no counts zero. The gist quotes each outlet’s own summary of its review. Published is the date on the review itself, read from the outlet’s page, so you can see whether an album’s reputation came at release or years later. Scores marked est. come from reviews that publish no number. Scores marked via Wikipedia are archive ratings, mostly for older albums, taken from the “Professional ratings” box on the album’s Wikipedia page (published openly through Wikidata); each links to the original review when we can find it online, and to that Wikipedia entry when we can’t. When an outlet reviewed an album twice, years apart (often for a reissue), both scores count, each labeled with its year.

A-Side marks the critics’ top tier. An album earns it automatically, from its numbers alone: a Breakdown of 90 or higher, from at least 5 reviews, with at least 75% approval. Nobody hands it out and nobody can buy it; if new reviews pull an album below the line, it loses the badge.

Report a problem


Discover more from B-Side Guys

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

Tags:

Leave a Reply