Early reviews. Critics give Oranges & Lemons an early B-Side Breakdown of 81 (Keeper), from 5 reviews so far. It will settle as more outlets weigh in.
The verdict on Oranges & Lemons
5 of 5 critics liked it, and they mostly agree.
- Highest 88 Chicago Sun-Times
- Lowest 75 Chicago Tribune
- Career #7 of XTC's 14 albums with a Breakdown
| Chicago Sun-Times via Wikipediaby Don McLeese | 3.5/4 | 88 | 1989 |
| Robert Christgau via Wikipediaby Robert Christgau | B- | 81 | 1989 |
| Rolling Stone via Wikipediaby Michael Azerrad | 4/5 | 80 | 1989 |
| Q via Wikipediaby Robert Sandall | 4/5 | 80 | |
| Chicago Tribune via Wikipediaby Chris Heim | 3/4 | 75 | 1989 |
Every Sunday: the week's new albums, scored by the critics. Plus our own reviews when we post them. Free, and one click to leave.
Oranges & Lemons in XTC's catalog
How these critics usually treat XTC
- Robert Christgau Harsher than usualLevel with the other critics here. Usually 12 points above on XTC's other albums (9).
- Chicago Tribune Harsher than usual7 points below the other critics here. Usually 5 points above on XTC's other albums (8).
- Rolling Stone Kinder than usual1 point below the other critics here. Usually 11 points below on XTC's other albums (6).
- Q About usual for them1 point below the other critics here. Usually 9 points below on XTC's other albums (10).
More from XTC
More Indie & Alternative from around 1989
Would you spin it again?
Be the first to answer. Results show once 3 listeners weigh in.
How the Breakdown works
Every outlet’s score is converted to 0–100 (2/5 is 40, 5.9/10 is 59) and averaged. A letter grade counts as the star rating it matches across thousands of reviews of the same albums, so a B+ is 75, like four stars, and a B is 65. Verdicts: Heavy Rotation is 85 and up, Keeper 70–84, Mixed Bag 55–69, Back of the Crate below 55. Approval is the share of critics who scored it 70 or higher (7/10, three and a half stars); the Breakdown shows green at 70 and up, red below. Divisiveness asks a different question: not how many critics liked it, but how close their scores are to each other. Five critics who all give it 50 are Unanimous, even though none of them liked it. The labels run Unanimous, Broad agreement, Some debate, Divided, and Contentious. Replay rate comes from listeners, not critics: yes counts fully, a few tracks counts half, no counts zero. The gist quotes each outlet’s own summary of its review. Published is the date on the review itself, read from the outlet’s page, so you can see whether an album’s reputation came at release or years later. Scores marked est. come from reviews that publish no number. Scores marked via Wikipedia are archive ratings, mostly for older albums, taken from the “Professional ratings” box on the album’s Wikipedia page (published openly through Wikidata); each links to the original review when we can find it online, and to that Wikipedia entry when we can’t. When an outlet reviewed an album twice, years apart (often for a reissue), both scores count, each labeled with its year.
A-Side marks the critics’ top tier. An album earns it automatically, from its numbers alone: a Breakdown of 90 or higher, from at least 5 reviews, with at least 75% approval. Nobody hands it out and nobody can buy it; if new reviews pull an album below the line, it loses the badge.










Leave a Reply