Critics give Present Tense a B-Side Breakdown of 80 (Keeper), from 9 reviews at outlets we track. Scores run 60 to 90.
The verdict on Present Tense
8 of 9 critics liked it, and they mostly agree.
- Highest 90 Uncut and NME
- Outlier 60 The Independent, 20 points below the next-lowest score
- Career #2 of Wild Beasts's 4 albums with a Breakdown
- By the numbers Wild Beasts's best-reviewed album here since Smother (2011).
| The gist | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Uncut via Wikipediaby Sam Richards | 9/10 | 90 | 2014 | |
| NME via Wikipediaby Al Horner | 9/10 | 90 | 2014 | “Wild Beasts have always been fantasists: four young men from Kendal who, finding the humdrum world around them wanting, transfigured it into a bawdy and beautiful playground. Their 2008 debut…” |
| Pitchfork via Wikipediaby Ian Cohen | 8.2/10 | 82 | 2014 | “The distinctive sound of Wild Beasts—the dueling voices of Hayden Thorpe and Tom Fleming, a sleek and supple rhythm section, immaculate production—remains on the new Present Tense, but there's a…” |
| Record Collector via Wikipediaby Sue Matiz | 4/5 | 80 | 2014 | “More than any British “guitar” band of their time, Kendal’s Wild Beasts’ career has thus far been defined by a healthy” |
| Q via Wikipediaby Ian Harrison | 4/5 | 80 | 2014 | |
| Mojo via Wikipediaby David Sheppard | 4/5 | 80 | 2014 | |
| The Guardian via Wikipediaby Rebecca Nicholson | 4/5 | 80 | 2014 | “Wild Beasts are still revelling in their idiosyncrasies, but this time they've honed those weird flourishes to perfection, writes Rebecca Nicholson” |
| AllMusic via Wikipediaby Heather Phares | 4/5 | 80 | ||
| The Independent via Wikipediaby Andy Gill | 3/5 | 60 | 2014 |
Every Sunday: the week's new albums, scored by the critics. Plus our own reviews when we post them. Free, and one click to leave.
Present Tense in Wild Beasts's catalog
How these critics usually treat Wild Beasts
- Uncut Kinder than usual11 points above the other critics here. Usually 1 point above on Wild Beasts's other albums (3).
- The Guardian About usual for themLevel with the other critics here. Usually 6 points below on Wild Beasts's other albums (3).
- Pitchfork About usual for them2 points above the other critics here. Usually 4 points above on Wild Beasts's other albums (3).
- NME About usual for them11 points above the other critics here. Usually 9 points above on Wild Beasts's other albums (3).
- AllMusic About usual for themLevel with the other critics here. Usually 1 point above on Wild Beasts's other albums (3).
More from Wild Beasts
More Indie & Alternative from around 2014
Would you spin it again?
Be the first to answer. Results show once 3 listeners weigh in.
How the Breakdown works
Every outlet’s score is converted to 0–100 (2/5 is 40, 5.9/10 is 59) and averaged. A letter grade counts as the star rating it matches across thousands of reviews of the same albums, so a B+ is 75, like four stars, and a B is 65. Verdicts: Heavy Rotation is 85 and up, Keeper 70–84, Mixed Bag 55–69, Back of the Crate below 55. Approval is the share of critics who scored it 70 or higher (7/10, three and a half stars); the Breakdown shows green at 70 and up, red below. Divisiveness asks a different question: not how many critics liked it, but how close their scores are to each other. Five critics who all give it 50 are Unanimous, even though none of them liked it. The labels run Unanimous, Broad agreement, Some debate, Divided, and Contentious. Replay rate comes from listeners, not critics: yes counts fully, a few tracks counts half, no counts zero. The gist quotes each outlet’s own summary of its review. Published is the date on the review itself, read from the outlet’s page, so you can see whether an album’s reputation came at release or years later. Scores marked est. come from reviews that publish no number. Scores marked via Wikipedia are archive ratings, mostly for older albums, taken from the “Professional ratings” box on the album’s Wikipedia page (published openly through Wikidata); each links to the original review when we can find it online, and to that Wikipedia entry when we can’t. When an outlet reviewed an album twice, years apart (often for a reissue), both scores count, each labeled with its year.
A-Side marks the critics’ top tier. An album earns it automatically, from its numbers alone: a Breakdown of 90 or higher, from at least 5 reviews, with at least 75% approval. Nobody hands it out and nobody can buy it; if new reviews pull an album below the line, it loses the badge.







Leave a Reply