Critics give Smother a B-Side Breakdown of 82 (B-), from 10 reviews at outlets we track. Scores run 70 to 90.
The verdict on Smother
9 of 10 critics liked it, and they mostly agree.
| The gist | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| NME via Wikipediaby Laura Snapes | 9/10 | 90 | 2011 | |
| AllMusic via Wikipediaby Heather Phares | 4.5/5 | 90 | ||
| The A.V. Club via Wikipediaby Monica Castillo | B+ | 88 | 2022 | “The A.V. Club digs deep into film, TV, music, games, books and more.” |
| Pitchfork via Wikipediaby David Bevan | 8.2/10 | 82 | 2011 | “The uncompromising UK art-pop group returns with a record that continues down the path of Two Dancers, paring its sound down even further.” |
| Uncut via Wikipediaby Louis Pattison | 4/5 | 80 | 2011 | |
| Q via Wikipediaby Victoria Segal | 4/5 | 80 | 2011 | |
| The Independent via Wikipediaby Andy Gill | 4/5 | 80 | 2011 | |
| Mojo via Wikipedia | 4/5 | 80 | 2011 | |
| The Guardian via Wikipediaby Dave Simpson | 4/5 | 80 | 2011 | “A change of direction for Wild Beasts results in album of extraordinary beauty, writes Dave Simpson” |
| Spin via Wikipediaby Jon Young | 7/10 | 70 | 2011 | “Surprisingly hot to the touch, Wild Beasts' third album does more with less, paring down the quartet's groove-inflected chamber pop to expose raw burning” |
Every Sunday: the week's new albums, scored by the critics. Plus our own reviews when we post them. Free, and one click to leave.
Smother in Wild Beasts's catalog
How these critics usually treat Wild Beasts
- AllMusic Kinder than usual9 points above the other critics here. Usually 2 points below on Wild Beasts's other albums (3).
- Uncut About usual for them2 points below the other critics here. Usually 5 points above on Wild Beasts's other albums (3).
- Pitchfork About usual for themLevel with the other critics here. Usually 5 points above on Wild Beasts's other albums (3).
- The Guardian About usual for them2 points below the other critics here. Usually 6 points below on Wild Beasts's other albums (3).
- NME About usual for them9 points above the other critics here. Usually 9 points above on Wild Beasts's other albums (3).
More from Wild Beasts
More Indie & Alternative from around 2011
Would you spin it again?
Be the first to answer. Results show once 3 listeners weigh in.
How the Breakdown works
Every outlet’s score is converted to 0–100 (2/5 is 40, 5.9/10 is 59, a B+ is 88) and averaged. Grades follow the B-Side scale: A is 90–100, B 80–89, C 70–79, D 60–69, F below 60. Approval is the share of critics who scored it 75 or higher; the Breakdown shows green at 75 and up, red below. Divisiveness asks a different question: not how many critics liked it, but how close their scores are to each other. Five critics who all give it 50 are Unanimous, even though none of them liked it. The labels run Unanimous, Broad agreement, Some debate, Divided, and Contentious. Replay rate comes from listeners, not critics: yes counts fully, a few tracks counts half, no counts zero. The gist quotes each outlet’s own summary of its review. Published is the date on the review itself, read from the outlet’s page, so you can see whether an album’s reputation came at release or years later. Scores marked est. come from reviews that publish no number. Scores marked via Wikipedia are archive ratings, mostly for older albums, taken from the “Professional ratings” box on the album’s Wikipedia page (published openly through Wikidata); each links to the original review when we can find it online, and to that Wikipedia entry when we can’t. When an outlet reviewed an album twice, years apart (often for a reissue), both scores count, each labeled with its year.
A-Side marks the critics’ top tier. An album earns it automatically, from its numbers alone: a Breakdown of 90 or higher, from at least 5 reviews, with at least 75% approval. Nobody hands it out and nobody can buy it; if new reviews pull an album below the line, it loses the badge.






Leave a Reply