Early reviews. Critics give Two Dancers an early B-Side Breakdown of 79 (C+), from 7 reviews so far. It will settle as more outlets weigh in.
The verdict on Two Dancers
6 of 7 critics liked it, and they mostly agree.
- Highest 90 NME
- Outlier 60 The Guardian, 20 points below the next-lowest score
- Career #3 of Wild Beasts's 4 albums with a Breakdown
| The gist | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| NME via Wikipediaby Emily Mackay | 9/10 | 90 | 2009 | “For more on Wild Beasts – including exclusive free downloads – head to NME.COM/wildbeasts Making the strange seem normal is the most accomplished act of artistic alchemy. Any idiot can…” |
| Pitchfork via Wikipediaby Stuart Berman | 8.4/10 | 84 | 2009 | “UK quartet follows 2008's fidgety, impulsive baroque-rock debut, Limbo, Panto, with an album that refashions them as a steely art-funk outfit.” |
| Uncut via Wikipediaby John Mulvey | 4/5 | 80 | 2009 | |
| Q via Wikipedia | 4/5 | 80 | 2009 | |
| Mojo via Wikipedia | 4/5 | 80 | 2009 | |
| AllMusic via Wikipediaby Heather Phares | 4/5 | 80 | ||
| The Guardian via Wikipediaby Alexis Petridis | 3/5 | 60 | 2009 | “Preposterous, camp and at times boldly original – Wild Beasts leave Alexis Petridis squealing for less” |
Every Sunday: the week's new albums, scored by the critics. Plus our own reviews when we post them. Free, and one click to leave.
Two Dancers in Wild Beasts's catalog
How these critics usually treat Wild Beasts
- The Guardian Harsher than usual22 points below the other critics here. Usually 1 point above on Wild Beasts's other albums (3).
- NME About usual for them13 points above the other critics here. Usually 8 points above on Wild Beasts's other albums (3).
- Uncut About usual for them1 point above the other critics here. Usually 4 points above on Wild Beasts's other albums (3).
- Pitchfork About usual for them6 points above the other critics here. Usually 3 points above on Wild Beasts's other albums (3).
- AllMusic About usual for them1 point above the other critics here. Usually level with the others on Wild Beasts's other albums (3).
More from Wild Beasts
More Indie & Alternative from around 2009
Would you spin it again?
Be the first to answer. Results show once 3 listeners weigh in.
How the Breakdown works
Every outlet’s score is converted to 0–100 (2/5 is 40, 5.9/10 is 59, a B+ is 88) and averaged. Grades follow the B-Side scale: A is 90–100, B 80–89, C 70–79, D 60–69, F below 60. Approval is the share of critics who scored it 75 or higher; the Breakdown shows green at 75 and up, red below. Divisiveness asks a different question: not how many critics liked it, but how close their scores are to each other. Five critics who all give it 50 are Unanimous, even though none of them liked it. The labels run Unanimous, Broad agreement, Some debate, Divided, and Contentious. Replay rate comes from listeners, not critics: yes counts fully, a few tracks counts half, no counts zero. The gist quotes each outlet’s own summary of its review. Published is the date on the review itself, read from the outlet’s page, so you can see whether an album’s reputation came at release or years later. Scores marked est. come from reviews that publish no number. Scores marked via Wikipedia are archive ratings, mostly for older albums, taken from the “Professional ratings” box on the album’s Wikipedia page (published openly through Wikidata); each links to the original review when we can find it online, and to that Wikipedia entry when we can’t. When an outlet reviewed an album twice, years apart (often for a reissue), both scores count, each labeled with its year.
A-Side marks the critics’ top tier. An album earns it automatically, from its numbers alone: a Breakdown of 90 or higher, from at least 5 reviews, with at least 75% approval. Nobody hands it out and nobody can buy it; if new reviews pull an album below the line, it loses the badge.






Leave a Reply