Critics give The Orbserver in the Star House a B-Side Breakdown of 65 (D), from 9 reviews at outlets we track. Scores run 40 to 80.
The verdict on The Orbserver in the Star House
Most critics weren't won over: 2 of 9 liked it.
- Highest 80 musicOMH and AllMusic
- Lowest 40 Consequence
- Career #12 of The Orb's 15 albums with a Breakdown
| musicOMH via Wikipediaby Mic Wright | 4/5 | 80 | |
| AllMusic via Wikipedia | 4/5 | 80 | |
| Rolling Stone via Wikipedia | 3.5/5 | 70 | |
| PopMatters via Wikipediaby Darryl G. Wright | 7/10 | 70 | 2012 |
| The Line of Best Fit via Wikipedia | 7/10 | 70 | 2012 |
| Pitchfork via Wikipediaby Brian Howe | 6.8/10 | 68 | 2012 |
| The Independent via Wikipediaby Andy Gill | 3/5 | 60 | 2012 |
| NME via Wikipediaby Ben Cardew | 5/10 | 50 | 2012 |
| Consequence via Wikipediaby Derek Staples | 2/5 | 40 | 2012 |
Every Sunday: the week's new albums, scored by the critics. Plus our own reviews when we post them. Free, and one click to leave.
The Orbserver in the Star House in The Orb's catalog
How these critics usually treat The Orb
- musicOMH Kinder than usual17 points above the other critics here. Usually 1 point below on The Orb's other albums (5).
- AllMusic Kinder than usual17 points above the other critics here. Usually 3 points above on The Orb's other albums (13).
- Rolling Stone About usual for them5 points above the other critics here. Usually 2 points below on The Orb's other albums (4).
- Pitchfork About usual for them3 points above the other critics here. Usually 4 points below on The Orb's other albums (7).
- NME About usual for them17 points below the other critics here. Usually 12 points below on The Orb's other albums (7).
- PopMatters About usual for them5 points above the other critics here. Usually 9 points above on The Orb's other albums (5).
More from The Orb
← Earlier The Dream (2007)Later → More Tales from the Orbservatory (2013)
More Electronic from around 2012
Would you spin it again?
Be the first to answer. Results show once 3 listeners weigh in.
How the Breakdown works
Every outlet’s score is converted to 0–100 (2/5 is 40, 5.9/10 is 59, a B+ is 88) and averaged. Grades follow the B-Side scale: A is 90–100, B 80–89, C 70–79, D 60–69, F below 60. Approval is the share of critics who scored it 75 or higher; the Breakdown shows green at 75 and up, red below. Divisiveness asks a different question: not how many critics liked it, but how close their scores are to each other. Five critics who all give it 50 are Unanimous, even though none of them liked it. The labels run Unanimous, Broad agreement, Some debate, Divided, and Contentious. Replay rate comes from listeners, not critics: yes counts fully, a few tracks counts half, no counts zero. The gist quotes each outlet’s own summary of its review. Published is the date on the review itself, read from the outlet’s page, so you can see whether an album’s reputation came at release or years later. Scores marked est. come from reviews that publish no number. Scores marked via Wikipedia are archive ratings, mostly for older albums, taken from the “Professional ratings” box on the album’s Wikipedia page (published openly through Wikidata); each links to the original review when we can find it online, and to that Wikipedia entry when we can’t. When an outlet reviewed an album twice, years apart (often for a reissue), both scores count, each labeled with its year.
A-Side marks the critics’ top tier. An album earns it automatically, from its numbers alone: a Breakdown of 90 or higher, from at least 5 reviews, with at least 75% approval. Nobody hands it out and nobody can buy it; if new reviews pull an album below the line, it loses the badge.










Leave a Reply