Critics give Moonbuilding 2703 AD a B-Side Breakdown of 75 (Keeper), from 9 reviews at outlets we track. Scores run 67 to 80.
The verdict on Moonbuilding 2703 AD
8 of 9 critics liked it, and they mostly agree.
- Highest 80 Record Collector, PopMatters, The Guardian and 2 more
- Lowest 67 Pitchfork
- Career Tied for #6 of The Orb's 15 albums with a Breakdown
| The gist | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Record Collector via Wikipediaby Sue Matiz | 4/5 | 80 | 2015 | “Not long ago, the early 90s era that birthed The Orb’s ambient techno sound was regarded as sooo outdated by hipsters unlearning the recent past and” |
| PopMatters via Wikipediaby John Garratt | 8/10 | 80 | 2015 | |
| The Guardian via Wikipediaby Jon Dennis | 4/5 | 80 | 2015 | “The Orb’s 13th album quickly establishes that their talent for arch ambient techno is undimmed” |
| Drowned in Sound via Wikipediaby Gavin Miller | 8/10 | 80 | 2015 | “It actually sounds kinda fun” |
| AllMusic via Wikipediaby Andy Kellman | 4/5 | 80 | ||
| Uncut via Wikipedia | 3.5/5 | 70 | 2015 | |
| Slant via Wikipediaby Benjamin Aspray | 3.5/5 | 70 | 2015 | “Moonbuilding 2703 AD is the Orb’s most cohesive work in ages.” |
| NME via Wikipediaby Lisa Wright | 7/10 | 70 | 2015 | “You know about the big releases each week, but what about the smaller albums which may have passed underneath your radar? We’ve rounded up nine of the best new album…” |
| Pitchfork via Wikipediaby Andy Beta | 6.7/10 | 67 | 2015 | “Rather than drift off into irrelevance in the 21st century, the Orb have become sturdy and workmanlike. Moonbuilding is, incredibly, the Orb's 10th album in the new century, and it…” |
Every Sunday: the week's new albums, scored by the critics. Plus our own reviews when we post them. Free, and one click to leave.
Moonbuilding 2703 AD in The Orb's catalog
How these critics usually treat The Orb
- The Guardian Kinder than usual5 points above the other critics here. Usually 8 points below on The Orb's other albums (3).
- Pitchfork About usual for them9 points below the other critics here. Usually 2 points below on The Orb's other albums (7).
- NME About usual for them6 points below the other critics here. Usually 13 points below on The Orb's other albums (7).
- Record Collector About usual for them5 points above the other critics here. Usually 12 points above on The Orb's other albums (5).
- PopMatters About usual for them5 points above the other critics here. Usually 10 points above on The Orb's other albums (5).
- Slant About usual for them6 points below the other critics here. Usually 2 points below on The Orb's other albums (3).
More from The Orb
← Earlier More Tales from the Orbservatory (2013)Later → COW / Chill Out, World! (2016)
More Electronic from around 2015
Would you spin it again?
Be the first to answer. Results show once 3 listeners weigh in.
How the Breakdown works
Every outlet’s score is converted to 0–100 (2/5 is 40, 5.9/10 is 59) and averaged. A letter grade counts as the star rating it matches across thousands of reviews of the same albums, so a B+ is 75, like four stars, and a B is 65. Verdicts: Heavy Rotation is 85 and up, Keeper 70–84, Mixed Bag 55–69, Back of the Crate below 55. Approval is the share of critics who scored it 70 or higher (7/10, three and a half stars); the Breakdown shows green at 70 and up, red below. Divisiveness asks a different question: not how many critics liked it, but how close their scores are to each other. Five critics who all give it 50 are Unanimous, even though none of them liked it. The labels run Unanimous, Broad agreement, Some debate, Divided, and Contentious. Replay rate comes from listeners, not critics: yes counts fully, a few tracks counts half, no counts zero. The gist quotes each outlet’s own summary of its review. Published is the date on the review itself, read from the outlet’s page, so you can see whether an album’s reputation came at release or years later. Scores marked est. come from reviews that publish no number. Scores marked via Wikipedia are archive ratings, mostly for older albums, taken from the “Professional ratings” box on the album’s Wikipedia page (published openly through Wikidata); each links to the original review when we can find it online, and to that Wikipedia entry when we can’t. When an outlet reviewed an album twice, years apart (often for a reissue), both scores count, each labeled with its year.
A-Side marks the critics’ top tier. An album earns it automatically, from its numbers alone: a Breakdown of 90 or higher, from at least 5 reviews, with at least 75% approval. Nobody hands it out and nobody can buy it; if new reviews pull an album below the line, it loses the badge.










Leave a Reply