Critics give Transference a B-Side Breakdown of 78 (Keeper), from 9 reviews at outlets we track. Scores run 70 to 88.
The verdict on Transference
9 of 9 critics liked it, and they mostly agree.
- Highest 88 Los Angeles Times
- Lowest 70 Spin, Rolling Stone and NME
- Career #8 of Spoon's 10 albums with a Breakdown
| The gist | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Los Angeles Times via Wikipediaby Todd Martens | 3.5/4 | 88 | 2010 | “Los Angeles Times blogs that were published between 2006 and 2013.” |
| Entertainment Weekly via Wikipediaby Whitney Pastorek | A- | 85 | 2010 | |
| The A.V. Club via Wikipediaby Tara Bennett | A- | 85 | 2022 | “The A.V. Club digs deep into film, TV, music, games, books and more.” |
| The Guardian via Wikipediaby Michael Hann | 4/5 | 80 | 2010 | “Leader Britt Daniel is a master of economy, writing songs to sparse and clipped arrangements, says Michael Hann” |
| AllMusic via Wikipediaby Heather Phares | 4/5 | 80 | ||
| Pitchfork via Wikipediaby Matthew Perpetua | 7.8/10 | 78 | 2010 | “Trading some of their signature groove for a more destabilizing sound, Spoon have created an offbeat, unexpected, but ultimately cerebral record.” |
| Spin via Wikipediaby Melissa Maerz | 7/10 | 70 | 2010 | “7SPIN Rating: 7 of 10Release Date: January 15, 2010Label: MergeIf Spoon had been meant to ride a comet out of the collegiate airwaves into modern-rock” |
| Rolling Stone via Wikipediaby David Fricke | 3.5/5 | 70 | 2010 | |
| NME via Wikipediaby Laura Snapes | 7/10 | 70 | 2010 | “Like [a]Wilco[/a], Texas’ [a]Spoon[/a] have long attempted to mix rock accessibility with wild experimentation. Unlike Jeff Tweedy’s gang, though, their efforts haven’t really been embraced over this side of the…” |
Every Sunday: the week's new albums, scored by the critics. Plus our own reviews when we post them. Free, and one click to leave.
Transference in Spoon's catalog
How these critics usually treat Spoon
- NME About usual for them10 points below the other critics here. Usually 16 points below on Spoon's other albums (3).
- Entertainment Weekly About usual for them7 points above the other critics here. Usually 2 points above on Spoon's other albums (7).
- Pitchfork About usual for them1 point below the other critics here. Usually 5 points above on Spoon's other albums (9).
- AllMusic About usual for them2 points above the other critics here. Usually 5 points above on Spoon's other albums (9).
- The Guardian About usual for them2 points above the other critics here. Usually 4 points above on Spoon's other albums (4).
- Rolling Stone About usual for them10 points below the other critics here. Usually 8 points below on Spoon's other albums (7).
More from Spoon
← Earlier Ga Ga Ga Ga Ga (2007)Later → They Want My Soul (2014)
More Indie & Alternative from around 2010
Would you spin it again?
Be the first to answer. Results show once 3 listeners weigh in.
How the Breakdown works
Every outlet’s score is converted to 0–100 (2/5 is 40, 5.9/10 is 59) and averaged. A letter grade counts as the star rating it matches across thousands of reviews of the same albums, so a B+ is 75, like four stars, and a B is 65. Verdicts: Heavy Rotation is 85 and up, Keeper 70–84, Mixed Bag 55–69, Back of the Crate below 55. Approval is the share of critics who scored it 70 or higher (7/10, three and a half stars); the Breakdown shows green at 70 and up, red below. Divisiveness asks a different question: not how many critics liked it, but how close their scores are to each other. Five critics who all give it 50 are Unanimous, even though none of them liked it. The labels run Unanimous, Broad agreement, Some debate, Divided, and Contentious. Replay rate comes from listeners, not critics: yes counts fully, a few tracks counts half, no counts zero. The gist quotes each outlet’s own summary of its review. Published is the date on the review itself, read from the outlet’s page, so you can see whether an album’s reputation came at release or years later. Scores marked est. come from reviews that publish no number. Scores marked via Wikipedia are archive ratings, mostly for older albums, taken from the “Professional ratings” box on the album’s Wikipedia page (published openly through Wikidata); each links to the original review when we can find it online, and to that Wikipedia entry when we can’t. When an outlet reviewed an album twice, years apart (often for a reissue), both scores count, each labeled with its year.
A-Side marks the critics’ top tier. An album earns it automatically, from its numbers alone: a Breakdown of 90 or higher, from at least 5 reviews, with at least 75% approval. Nobody hands it out and nobody can buy it; if new reviews pull an album below the line, it loses the badge.










Leave a Reply