Hot Thoughts

Spoon – Hot Thoughts: B-Side Breakdown 81 (B-) from 9 critic reviews.

Album cover for Hot Thoughts by Spoon
Released March 17, 2017
Shop on AmazonAs an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.
Spoon

Hot Thoughts

81
B-Side BreakdownGrade B- · 9 critics · 78% approval
B-Side Breakdown81Grade: B-
Approval78%7 of 9 critics scored it 75 or higher
DivisivenessSome debateHow close the scores are: most critics land within 22 points of each other

Critics give Hot Thoughts a B-Side Breakdown of 81 (B-), from 9 reviews at outlets we track. Scores run 60 to 100.

The verdict on Hot Thoughts

7 of 9 critics liked it, with some disagreement on how much.

020406080100NME: 60Pitchfork: 74Uncut: 80Q: 80Rolling Stone: 80AllMusic: 80Chicago Tribune: 88Entertainment Weekly: 91The Guardian: 100 Breakdown 81
The gist
The Guardian via Wikipediaby Jon Dennis 5/5 100 2017
Entertainment Weekly via Wikipediaby Jonathan Bernstein A- 91 2017
Chicago Tribune via Wikipediaby Greg Kot 3.5/4 88 2017
Uncut via Wikipediaby Bud Scoppa 8/10 80 2017
Q via Wikipediaby Tom Doyle 4/5 80 2017
Rolling Stone via Wikipediaby Will Hermes 4/5 80 2017 “Our take on the latest from the Austin post-punks.”
AllMusic via Wikipediaby Heather Phares 4/5 80
Pitchfork via Wikipediaby Jill Mapes 7.4/10 74 2017 “Spoon stay in their well-earned lane but tweak the formula just enough on their ninth album, keeping their reliably great songwriting and adding new, electronic textures.”
NME via Wikipediaby Jamie Milton 3/5 60 2017 “The critical darlings take another smart, subtle and stylish step forward on 'Hot Thoughts'. Get the NME verdict”

Hot Thoughts in Spoon's catalog

75Telephono (1996): 6262A Series of Sneaks (1998): 8282Girls Can Tell (2001): 8484Kill the Moonlight (2002): 8181Gimme Fiction (2005): 8181Ga Ga Ga Ga Ga (2007): 8282Transference (2010): 8080They Want My Soul (2014): 8282Hot Thoughts (2017): 8181This oneLucifer on the Sofa (2022): 848419962022
Spoon's albums by B-Side Breakdown, in release order. Above the dashed line, most critics liked it. Every Spoon album, ranked

How these critics usually treat Spoon

  • The Guardian Kinder than usual21 points above the other critics here. Usually 2 points below on Spoon's other albums (4).
  • NME Harsher than usual24 points below the other critics here. Usually 12 points below on Spoon's other albums (3).
  • Pitchfork Harsher than usual8 points below the other critics here. Usually 3 points above on Spoon's other albums (9).
  • Rolling Stone Kinder than usual2 points below the other critics here. Usually 11 points below on Spoon's other albums (7).
  • AllMusic About usual for them2 points below the other critics here. Usually 3 points above on Spoon's other albums (9).
  • Entertainment Weekly About usual for them11 points above the other critics here. Usually 9 points above on Spoon's other albums (7).

More from Spoon

See all Spoon albums ranked

More Indie & Alternative from around 2017

Would you spin it again?

Be the first to answer. Results show once 3 listeners weigh in.

How the Breakdown works

Every outlet’s score is converted to 0–100 (2/5 is 40, 5.9/10 is 59, a B+ is 88) and averaged. Grades follow the B-Side scale: A is 90–100, B 80–89, C 70–79, D 60–69, F below 60. Approval is the share of critics who scored it 75 or higher; the Breakdown shows green at 75 and up, red below. Divisiveness asks a different question: not how many critics liked it, but how close their scores are to each other. Five critics who all give it 50 are Unanimous, even though none of them liked it. The labels run Unanimous, Broad agreement, Some debate, Divided, and Contentious. Replay rate comes from listeners, not critics: yes counts fully, a few tracks counts half, no counts zero. The gist quotes each outlet’s own summary of its review. Published is the date on the review itself, read from the outlet’s page, so you can see whether an album’s reputation came at release or years later. Scores marked est. come from reviews that publish no number. Scores marked via Wikipedia are archive ratings, mostly for older albums, taken from the “Professional ratings” box on the album’s Wikipedia page (published openly through Wikidata); each links to the original review when we can find it online, and to that Wikipedia entry when we can’t. When an outlet reviewed an album twice, years apart (often for a reissue), both scores count, each labeled with its year.

A-Side marks the critics’ top tier. An album earns it automatically, from its numbers alone: a Breakdown of 90 or higher, from at least 5 reviews, with at least 75% approval. Nobody hands it out and nobody can buy it; if new reviews pull an album below the line, it loses the badge.

Report a problem


Discover more from B-Side Guys

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

Tags:

Leave a Reply