Pygmalion

Slowdive – Pygmalion: B-Side Breakdown 74 (C) from 9 critic reviews.

Album cover for Pygmalion by Slowdive
Released February 6, 1995
Shop on AmazonAs an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.
Slowdive

Pygmalion

74
B-Side BreakdownGrade C · 9 critics · 67% approval
B-Side Breakdown74Grade: C
Approval67%6 of 9 critics scored it 75 or higher
DivisivenessDividedHow close the scores are: most critics land within 38 points of each other

Based on 9 reviews from outlets we track. Scores run 40 to 100.

By the numbers: Scores ran from 40 (Select) to 100 (Sputnikmusic).

020406080100Select: 40NME: 50Mojo: 60The Guardian: 75Uncut: 80Q: 80AllMusic: 80Sputnikmusic: 100Record Collector: 100 Breakdown 74
The gist
Sputnikmusic via Wikipediaby Praise Jimmy 5/5 100 “Slowdive – Pygmalion review: Listen close, it's all in pain.”
Record Collector via Wikipedia 5/5 100 2006
Uncut via Wikipediaby Piers Martin 8/10 80 2006
Q via Wikipediaby Andrew Collins 4/5 80 2006
AllMusic via Wikipediaby Nitsuh Abebe 4/5 80
The Guardian via Wikipediaby Caroline Sullivan 3/4 75 2006
Mojo via Wikipediaby Ian Harrison 3/5 60 2006
NME via Wikipediaby John Harris 5/10 50 2015 “Slowdive's third album just like its predecessor was completely and utterly overlooked upon release. Some may blame that on Creation who were now focused on delivering hits, but the press…”
Select via Wikipediaby Gareth Grundy 2/5 40 2006

More from Slowdive

See all Slowdive albums ranked

More Indie & Alternative from around 1995

Would you spin it again?

Be the first to answer. Results show once 3 listeners weigh in.

How the Breakdown works

Every outlet’s score is converted to 0–100 (2/5 is 40, 5.9/10 is 59, a B+ is 88) and averaged. Grades follow the B-Side scale: A is 90–100, B 80–89, C 70–79, D 60–69, F below 60. Approval is the share of critics who scored it 75 or higher; the Breakdown shows green at 75 and up, red below. Divisiveness asks a different question: not how many critics liked it, but how close their scores are to each other. Five critics who all give it 50 are Unanimous, even though none of them liked it. The labels run Unanimous, Broad agreement, Some debate, Divided, and Contentious. Replay rate comes from listeners, not critics: yes counts fully, a few tracks counts half, no counts zero. The gist quotes each outlet’s own summary of its review. Published is the date on the review itself, read from the outlet’s page, so you can see whether an album’s reputation came at release or years later. Scores marked est. come from reviews that publish no number. Scores marked via Wikipedia are archive ratings, mostly for older albums, taken from the “Professional ratings” box on the album’s Wikipedia page (published openly through Wikidata); each links to the original review when we can find it online, and to that Wikipedia entry when we can’t. When an outlet reviewed an album twice, years apart (often for a reissue), both scores count, each labeled with its year.

A-Side marks the critics’ top tier. An album earns it automatically, from its numbers alone: a Breakdown of 90 or higher, from at least 5 reviews, with at least 75% approval. Nobody hands it out and nobody can buy it; if new reviews pull an album below the line, it loses the badge.

Report a problem

Tags:

Leave a Reply