Critics give Everything Is Alive a B-Side Breakdown of 81 (B-), from 9 reviews at outlets we track. Scores run 60 to 100.
The verdict on Everything Is Alive
8 of 9 critics liked it, with some disagreement on how much.
- Highest 100 Louder Than War
- Lowest 60 Mojo
- Career #2 of Slowdive's 5 albums with a Breakdown
- By the numbers Slowdive's best-reviewed album here since Slowdive (2017).
| The gist | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Louder Than War via Wikipediaby Wayne Carey | 5/5 | 100 | 2023 | “Six years on from their amazing comeback album, the self titled Slowdive which was one of our albums of the year, the shoegaze masters…” |
| Uncut via Wikipedia | 9/10 | 90 | 2023 | |
| Slant via Wikipediaby Dana Poland | 4/5 | 80 | 2023 | “Slowdive’s ‘Everything Is Alive’ evolves the shoegaze band’s well-established sound with more electronic textures.” |
| DIY via Wikipediaby Joe Goggins | 4/5 | 80 | 2023 | “It very much gives off the sense that the slower gestations lead to the richest rewards.” |
| The Guardian via Wikipediaby Dave Simpson | 4/5 | 80 | 2023 | “The band perfected their blend of dreamy guitar noise washes and indecipherable lyrics decades ago, and the latest example has plenty of haunting beauty” |
| Clash via Wikipediaby Robin Murray | 8/10 | 80 | 2023 | “Slowdive’s second act has been a thing to behold. After a brief chapter as flavour-of-the-month, the music press attempted to bury the shoegaze darlings,” |
| AllMusic via Wikipediaby Tim Sendra | 4/5 | 80 | ||
| Pitchfork via Wikipediaby Jayson Greene | 7.7/10 | 77 | 2023 | |
| Mojo via Wikipedia | 3/5 | 60 | 2023 |
Every Sunday: the week's new albums, scored by the critics. Plus our own reviews when we post them. Free, and one click to leave.
More from Slowdive
More Indie & Alternative from around 2023
Would you spin it again?
Be the first to answer. Results show once 3 listeners weigh in.
How the Breakdown works
Every outlet’s score is converted to 0–100 (2/5 is 40, 5.9/10 is 59, a B+ is 88) and averaged. Grades follow the B-Side scale: A is 90–100, B 80–89, C 70–79, D 60–69, F below 60. Approval is the share of critics who scored it 75 or higher; the Breakdown shows green at 75 and up, red below. Divisiveness asks a different question: not how many critics liked it, but how close their scores are to each other. Five critics who all give it 50 are Unanimous, even though none of them liked it. The labels run Unanimous, Broad agreement, Some debate, Divided, and Contentious. Replay rate comes from listeners, not critics: yes counts fully, a few tracks counts half, no counts zero. The gist quotes each outlet’s own summary of its review. Published is the date on the review itself, read from the outlet’s page, so you can see whether an album’s reputation came at release or years later. Scores marked est. come from reviews that publish no number. Scores marked via Wikipedia are archive ratings, mostly for older albums, taken from the “Professional ratings” box on the album’s Wikipedia page (published openly through Wikidata); each links to the original review when we can find it online, and to that Wikipedia entry when we can’t. When an outlet reviewed an album twice, years apart (often for a reissue), both scores count, each labeled with its year.
A-Side marks the critics’ top tier. An album earns it automatically, from its numbers alone: a Breakdown of 90 or higher, from at least 5 reviews, with at least 75% approval. Nobody hands it out and nobody can buy it; if new reviews pull an album below the line, it loses the badge.








Leave a Reply