Critics give Tilt a B-Side Breakdown of 80 (B-), from 8 reviews at outlets we track. Scores run 75 to 86.
The verdict on Tilt
8 of 8 critics liked it, and they mostly agree.
- Highest 86 Pitchfork
- Lowest 75 Chicago Tribune
- Career #4 of Scott Walker's 5 albums with a Breakdown
| The gist | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pitchfork via Wikipediaby Jazz Monroe | 8.6/10 | 86 | 2022 | |
| PopMattersby Steve Horowitz | 8/10 | 80 | 2020 | “It's been 25 years since Scott Walker released his dark masterpiece Tilt (8 May 1995). The album was met with positive reviews despite or maybe because of its” |
| Spin via Wikipediaby Jeffrey Rotter | 8/10 | 80 | 1997 | |
| Rolling Stone via Wikipediaby Rob Kemp | 4/5 | 80 | 1997 | |
| Sputnikmusic via Wikipedia | 4/5 | 80 | 2006 | |
| The Guardian via Wikipediaby Caroline Sullivan | 4/5 | 80 | 2005 | |
| AllMusic via Wikipediaby Dave Thompson | 4/5 | 80 | ||
| Chicago Tribune via Wikipediaby Greg Kot | 3/4 | 75 | 2005 |
Every Sunday: the week's new albums, scored by the critics. Plus our own reviews when we post them. Free, and one click to leave.
Tilt in Scott Walker's catalog
How these critics usually treat Scott Walker
- Pitchfork Kinder than usual7 points above the other critics here. Usually 4 points below on Scott Walker's other albums (4).
- The Guardian Harsher than usualLevel with the other critics here. Usually 10 points above on Scott Walker's other albums (3).
- AllMusic About usual for themLevel with the other critics here. Usually 3 points above on Scott Walker's other albums (4).
More from Scott Walker
More Rock from around 1995
Would you spin it again?
Be the first to answer. Results show once 3 listeners weigh in.
How the Breakdown works
Every outlet’s score is converted to 0–100 (2/5 is 40, 5.9/10 is 59, a B+ is 88) and averaged. Grades follow the B-Side scale: A is 90–100, B 80–89, C 70–79, D 60–69, F below 60. Approval is the share of critics who scored it 75 or higher; the Breakdown shows green at 75 and up, red below. Divisiveness asks a different question: not how many critics liked it, but how close their scores are to each other. Five critics who all give it 50 are Unanimous, even though none of them liked it. The labels run Unanimous, Broad agreement, Some debate, Divided, and Contentious. Replay rate comes from listeners, not critics: yes counts fully, a few tracks counts half, no counts zero. The gist quotes each outlet’s own summary of its review. Published is the date on the review itself, read from the outlet’s page, so you can see whether an album’s reputation came at release or years later. Scores marked est. come from reviews that publish no number. Scores marked via Wikipedia are archive ratings, mostly for older albums, taken from the “Professional ratings” box on the album’s Wikipedia page (published openly through Wikidata); each links to the original review when we can find it online, and to that Wikipedia entry when we can’t. When an outlet reviewed an album twice, years apart (often for a reissue), both scores count, each labeled with its year.
A-Side marks the critics’ top tier. An album earns it automatically, from its numbers alone: a Breakdown of 90 or higher, from at least 5 reviews, with at least 75% approval. Nobody hands it out and nobody can buy it; if new reviews pull an album below the line, it loses the badge.








Leave a Reply