Lupercalia

Patrick Wolf – Lupercalia: B-Side Breakdown 77 (Keeper) from 8 critic reviews.

Album cover for Lupercalia by Patrick Wolf
Released January 1, 2011
Shop on AmazonAs an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.
Patrick Wolf

Lupercalia

77
B-Side BreakdownKeeper · 8 critics · 75% approval
B-Side Breakdown77Keeper
Approval75%6 of 8 critics scored it 70 or higher
DivisivenessSome debateHow close the scores are: most critics land within 24 points of each other

Critics give Lupercalia a B-Side Breakdown of 77 (Keeper), from 8 reviews at outlets we track. Scores run 55 to 90.

The verdict on Lupercalia

6 of 8 critics liked it, with some disagreement on how much.

020406080100Pitchfork: 55The Independent: 60Q: 80NME: 80The Guardian: 80AllMusic: 80Sputnikmusic: 90Slant: 90 Breakdown 77
The gist
Sputnikmusic via Wikipediaby Channing Freeman 4.5/5 90 2011 “Patrick Wolf – Lupercalia review: Growing up, growing older, with treasure to be told.”
Slant via Wikipediaby Matthew Cole 4.5/5 90 2011 “RIAA be damned, Lupercalia is a golden record if ever we’ve heard one.”
Q via Wikipedia 4/5 80
NME via Wikipedia 4/5 80 2011 “If ‘Lycanthropy’ – [a]Patrick Wolf[/a]’s first album – was an exploration of how to transform oneself into another form, then ‘Lupercalia’ is the end result of the experiment. The original…”
The Guardian via Wikipediaby Alexis Petridis 4/5 80 2011 “Patrick Wolf doesn't seem to like people praising his work. He better look away now, says Alexis Petridis”
AllMusic via Wikipediaby Jon O'Brien 4/5 80
The Independent via Wikipediaby Andy Gill 3/5 60 2011 “Patrick Wolf is perennially tipped for success, but after four previous albums it's questionable whether his idiosyncratic talent – which here combines dulcimer, Ondes Martenot and baritone ukulele with a…”
Pitchfork via Wikipedia 5.5/10 55 2011

Lupercalia in Patrick Wolf's catalog

70Lycanthropy (2003): 7474Wind in the Wires (2005): 7878The Magic Position (2007): 7777The Bachelor (2009): 7272Lupercalia (2011): 7777This oneCrying the Neck (2025): 737320032025
Patrick Wolf's albums by B-Side Breakdown, in release order. Above the dashed line, most critics liked it. Every Patrick Wolf album, ranked

How these critics usually treat Patrick Wolf

  • Pitchfork Harsher than usual25 points below the other critics here. Usually 3 points above on Patrick Wolf's other albums (4).
  • AllMusic About usual for them4 points above the other critics here. Usually level with the others on Patrick Wolf's other albums (4).
  • NME About usual for them4 points above the other critics here. Usually 1 point above on Patrick Wolf's other albums (3).
  • Slant About usual for them15 points above the other critics here. Usually 16 points above on Patrick Wolf's other albums (3).

More from Patrick Wolf

See all Patrick Wolf albums ranked

More Indie & Alternative from around 2011

Would you spin it again?

Be the first to answer. Results show once 3 listeners weigh in.

How the Breakdown works

Every outlet’s score is converted to 0–100 (2/5 is 40, 5.9/10 is 59) and averaged. A letter grade counts as the star rating it matches across thousands of reviews of the same albums, so a B+ is 75, like four stars, and a B is 65. Verdicts: Heavy Rotation is 85 and up, Keeper 70–84, Mixed Bag 55–69, Back of the Crate below 55. Approval is the share of critics who scored it 70 or higher (7/10, three and a half stars); the Breakdown shows green at 70 and up, red below. Divisiveness asks a different question: not how many critics liked it, but how close their scores are to each other. Five critics who all give it 50 are Unanimous, even though none of them liked it. The labels run Unanimous, Broad agreement, Some debate, Divided, and Contentious. Replay rate comes from listeners, not critics: yes counts fully, a few tracks counts half, no counts zero. The gist quotes each outlet’s own summary of its review. Published is the date on the review itself, read from the outlet’s page, so you can see whether an album’s reputation came at release or years later. Scores marked est. come from reviews that publish no number. Scores marked via Wikipedia are archive ratings, mostly for older albums, taken from the “Professional ratings” box on the album’s Wikipedia page (published openly through Wikidata); each links to the original review when we can find it online, and to that Wikipedia entry when we can’t. When an outlet reviewed an album twice, years apart (often for a reissue), both scores count, each labeled with its year.

A-Side marks the critics’ top tier. An album earns it automatically, from its numbers alone: a Breakdown of 90 or higher, from at least 5 reviews, with at least 75% approval. Nobody hands it out and nobody can buy it; if new reviews pull an album below the line, it loses the badge.

Report a problem


Discover more from B-Side Guys

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

Tags:

Leave a Reply