New Adventures in Hi-Fi

R.E.M. – New Adventures in Hi-Fi: B-Side Breakdown 88 (B+) from 9 critic reviews.

Album cover for New Adventures in Hi-Fi by R.E.M.
Released September 9, 1996
Shop on AmazonAs an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.
R.E.M.

New Adventures in Hi-Fi

88
B-Side BreakdownGrade B+ · 9 critics · 89% approval
B-Side Breakdown88Grade: B+
Approval89%8 of 9 critics scored it 75 or higher
DivisivenessSome debateHow close the scores are: most critics land within 24 points of each other

Based on 9 reviews from outlets we track. Scores run 60 to 100.

By the numbers: R.E.M.'s best-reviewed album here since Automatic for the People (1992). Scores ran from 60 (The Guardian) to 100 (Q).

020406080100The Guardian: 60NME: 80AllMusic: 80Rolling Stone: 90Robert Christgau: 91Pitchfork: 95Entertainment Weekly: 95Q: 100Los Angeles Times: 100 Breakdown 88
Q via Wikipediaby Bill Prince 5/5 100
Los Angeles Times via Wikipediaby Robert Hilburn 4/4 100 1996
Pitchfork via Wikipediaby Ryan Schreiber 9.5/10 95
Entertainment Weekly via Wikipediaby David Browne A 95
Robert Christgau via Wikipediaby Robert Christgau A- 91
Rolling Stone via Wikipediaby Mark Kemp 4.5/5 90 1996
NME via Wikipediaby Steve Sutherland 8/10 80
AllMusic via Wikipediaby Stephen Thomas Erlewine 4/5 80
The Guardian via Wikipediaby Caroline Sullivan 3/5 60

More from R.E.M.

See all R.E.M. albums ranked

More Indie & Alternative from around 1996

Would you spin it again?

Be the first to answer. Results show once 3 listeners weigh in.

How the Breakdown works

Every outlet’s score is converted to 0–100 (2/5 is 40, 5.9/10 is 59, a B+ is 88) and averaged. Grades follow the B-Side scale: A is 90–100, B 80–89, C 70–79, D 60–69, F below 60. Approval is the share of critics who scored it 75 or higher; the Breakdown shows green at 75 and up, red below. Divisiveness asks a different question: not how many critics liked it, but how close their scores are to each other. Five critics who all give it 50 are Unanimous, even though none of them liked it. The labels run Unanimous, Broad agreement, Some debate, Divided, and Contentious. Replay rate comes from listeners, not critics: yes counts fully, a few tracks counts half, no counts zero. The gist quotes each outlet’s own summary of its review. Published is the date on the review itself, read from the outlet’s page, so you can see whether an album’s reputation came at release or years later. Scores marked est. come from reviews that publish no number. Scores marked via Wikipedia are archive ratings, mostly for older albums, taken from the “Professional ratings” box on the album’s Wikipedia page (published openly through Wikidata); each links to the original review when we can find it online, and to that Wikipedia entry when we can’t. When an outlet reviewed an album twice, years apart (often for a reissue), both scores count, each labeled with its year.

A-Side marks the critics’ top tier. An album earns it automatically, from its numbers alone: a Breakdown of 90 or higher, from at least 5 reviews, with at least 75% approval. Nobody hands it out and nobody can buy it; if new reviews pull an album below the line, it loses the badge.

Report a problem

Tags:

Leave a Reply