Critics give Talkin to the Trees a B-Side Breakdown of 71 (C-), from 12 reviews at outlets we track. Scores run 60 to 80.
The verdict on Talkin to the Trees
Most critics weren't won over: 4 of 12 liked it.
- Highest 80 Cult Following, The Telegraph, Mojo and The Arts Desk
- Lowest 60 Rolling Stone Australia, Rolling Stone and The Independent
- Career #21 of Neil Young's 31 albums with a Breakdown
| The gist | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cult Followingby Ewan Gleadow | 4/5 | 80 | May 23, 2025 | “Fiery comments and a few pot shots at deserving targets are not enough for politically charged music. Neil Young knows this, and in the lead-up to Talkin’ to the Trees,…” |
| The Telegraph via Wikipediaby Andrew Perry | 4/5 | 80 | 2025 | |
| Mojo via Wikipediaby Stephen Thomas Erlewine | 4/5 | 80 | Jun 9, 2025 | “Backed by new band The Chrome Hearts, Neil Young rails against the times on 46th studio album. Read MOJO's ★★★★ review and the track listing in full.” |
| The Arts Desk via Wikipediaby Guy Oddy | 4/5 | 80 | Jun 12, 2025 | “When Neil Young releases a new album, you can be reasonably sure that you’ll get either a disc of melancholy singer-songwriter fare or a set of blistering rock’n’roll. His debut…” |
| Uncut via Wikipediaby Michael Bonner | 3.5/5 | 70 | Jun 9, 2025 | |
| The Line of Best Fit via Wikipediaby Janne Oinonen | 7/10 | 70 | Jun 12, 2025 | “Talkin’ To The Trees is no major return to form for Neil Young, however, it's committed to keeping things simple and looking inwards for inspiration.” |
| Louder via Wikipedia | 3.5/5 | 70 | 2025 | |
| AllMusic via Wikipediaby Mark Deming | 3.5/5 | 70 | ||
| Paste via Wikipediaby Matt Mitchell | 6.8/10 | 68 | Jun 13, 2025 | “Paste Magazine is your source for the best music, movies, TV, comedy, videogames, books, comics, craft beer, politics and more. Discover your favorite albums and films.” |
| Rolling Stone Australiaby Neil Griffiths | 3/5 | 60 | Jun 13, 2025 | “Neil Young and the Chrome Hearts' 'Talkin to the Trees' Review” |
| Rolling Stone via Wikipediaby Rob Sheffield | 3/5 | 60 | Jun 13, 2025 | “Neil Young and the Chrome Hearts' 'Talkin to the Trees' Review” |
| The Independent via Wikipediaby Helen Brown | 3/5 | 60 | Jun 13, 2025 | “On his 48th album, we find the Godfather of Grunge beetling along heroically/tediously in the same old tyre tracks he’s been stuck in for years” |
Every Sunday: the week's new albums, scored by the critics. Plus our own reviews when we post them. Free, and one click to leave.
Talkin to the Trees in Neil Young's catalog
How these critics usually treat Neil Young
- Paste Harsher than usual3 points below the other critics here. Usually 12 points above on Neil Young's other albums (6).
- Rolling Stone Harsher than usual12 points below the other critics here. Usually 1 point above on Neil Young's other albums (20).
- Mojo Kinder than usual10 points above the other critics here. Usually 1 point below on Neil Young's other albums (8).
- Louder Harsher than usual1 point below the other critics here. Usually 8 points above on Neil Young's other albums (7).
- Uncut Harsher than usual1 point below the other critics here. Usually 7 points above on Neil Young's other albums (13).
- AllMusic About usual for them1 point below the other critics here. Usually 7 points below on Neil Young's other albums (30).
From B-Side Guys
More from Neil Young
More Rock from around 2025
Would you spin it again?
Be the first to answer. Results show once 3 listeners weigh in.
How the Breakdown works
Every outlet’s score is converted to 0–100 (2/5 is 40, 5.9/10 is 59, a B+ is 88) and averaged. Grades follow the B-Side scale: A is 90–100, B 80–89, C 70–79, D 60–69, F below 60. Approval is the share of critics who scored it 75 or higher; the Breakdown shows green at 75 and up, red below. Divisiveness asks a different question: not how many critics liked it, but how close their scores are to each other. Five critics who all give it 50 are Unanimous, even though none of them liked it. The labels run Unanimous, Broad agreement, Some debate, Divided, and Contentious. Replay rate comes from listeners, not critics: yes counts fully, a few tracks counts half, no counts zero. The gist quotes each outlet’s own summary of its review. Published is the date on the review itself, read from the outlet’s page, so you can see whether an album’s reputation came at release or years later. Scores marked est. come from reviews that publish no number. Scores marked via Wikipedia are archive ratings, mostly for older albums, taken from the “Professional ratings” box on the album’s Wikipedia page (published openly through Wikidata); each links to the original review when we can find it online, and to that Wikipedia entry when we can’t. When an outlet reviewed an album twice, years apart (often for a reissue), both scores count, each labeled with its year.
A-Side marks the critics’ top tier. An album earns it automatically, from its numbers alone: a Breakdown of 90 or higher, from at least 5 reviews, with at least 75% approval. Nobody hands it out and nobody can buy it; if new reviews pull an album below the line, it loses the badge.










Leave a Reply