Living with War

Neil Young – Living with War: B-Side Breakdown 82 (B-) from 9 critic reviews.

Album cover for Living with War by Neil Young
Released May 2, 2006
Shop on AmazonAs an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.
Neil Young

Living with War

82
B-Side BreakdownGrade B- · 9 critics · 89% approval
B-Side Breakdown82Grade: B-
Approval89%8 of 9 critics scored it 75 or higher
DivisivenessBroad agreementHow close the scores are: most critics land within 16 points of each other

Based on 9 reviews from outlets we track. Scores run 70 to 100.

By the numbers: 8 of 9 critics liked it, with AllMusic the lone holdout at 70. The third best-reviewed Rock album of 2006 we've tracked.

020406080100AllMusic: 70Pitchfork: 76Uncut: 80Q: 80Rolling Stone: 80The Guardian: 80Robert Christgau: 88Entertainment Weekly: 88Los Angeles Times: 100 Breakdown 82
The gist
Los Angeles Times via Wikipedia 4/4 100
Robert Christgau via Wikipedia B+ 88
Entertainment Weekly via Wikipedia B+ 88
Uncut via Wikipedia 8/10 80
Q via Wikipedia 4/5 80
Rolling Stone via Wikipedia 4/5 80 “Check out our album review of Artist's Living With War on Rolling Stone.com.”
The Guardian via Wikipedia 4/5 80
Pitchfork via Wikipedia 7.6/10 76 “Like Bruce Springsteen's We Shall Overcome: The Seeger Sessions, this album features an elder rock statesman making an effective protest record thanks to a raucously communal approach.”
AllMusic via Wikipedia 3.5/5 70

From B-Side Guys

More from Neil Young

See all Neil Young albums ranked

More Rock from around 2006

Would you spin it again?

Be the first to answer. Results show once 3 listeners weigh in.

How the Breakdown works

Every outlet’s score is converted to 0–100 (2/5 is 40, 5.9/10 is 59, a B+ is 88) and averaged. Grades follow the B-Side scale: A is 90–100, B 80–89, C 70–79, D 60–69, F below 60. Approval is the share of critics who scored it 75 or higher; the Breakdown shows green at 75 and up, red below. Divisiveness asks a different question: not how many critics liked it, but how close their scores are to each other. Five critics who all give it 50 are Unanimous, even though none of them liked it. The labels run Unanimous, Broad agreement, Some debate, Divided, and Contentious. Replay rate comes from listeners, not critics: yes counts fully, a few tracks counts half, no counts zero. The gist quotes each outlet’s own summary of its review. Published is the date on the review itself, read from the outlet’s page, so you can see whether an album’s reputation came at release or years later. Scores marked est. come from reviews that publish no number. Scores marked via Wikipedia are archive ratings, mostly for older albums, taken from the “Professional ratings” box on the album’s Wikipedia page (published openly through Wikidata); each links to the original review when we can find it online, and to that Wikipedia entry when we can’t. When an outlet reviewed an album twice, years apart (often for a reissue), both scores count, each labeled with its year.

A-Side marks the critics’ top tier. An album earns it automatically, from its numbers alone: a Breakdown of 85 or higher, from at least 5 reviews, with at least 75% approval. Nobody hands it out and nobody can buy it; if new reviews pull an album below the line, it loses the badge.

Report a problem

Tags:

Leave a Reply