Based on 9 reviews from outlets we track. Scores run 60 to 95.
By the numbers: 8 of 9 critics liked it, with Record Collector the lone holdout at 60.
| The gist | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Paste via Wikipediaby Matt Mitchell | 9.5/10 | 95 | 2023 | “Neil Young's Chrome Dreams is a piercing and emotional portrait of a genius grappling with a transitional period in his career.” |
| Uncut via Wikipediaby Rob Mitchum | 4.5/5 | 90 | ||
| AllMusic via Wikipediaby Fred Thomas | 4.5/5 | 90 | ||
| Pitchfork via Wikipediaby Stephen Thomas Erlewine | 8.5/10 | 85 | 2023 | |
| Louder via Wikipedia | 4/5 | 80 | 2006 | |
| Mojo via Wikipediaby Sylvie Simmons | 4/5 | 80 | 2006 | |
| The Arts Desk via Wikipediaby Tim Cumming | 4/5 | 80 | “A curious and rather marvellous sonic chimera manifests in the twilight of the rock gods, an album from 1977 finding its physical release 46 years after it was committed to…” | |
| Clash via Wikipediaby Nick Roseblade | 8/10 | 80 | 2023 | “How many times can you think of a sequel coming out before the original? There might be occasions where a Part II was filmed before Part III. Back To The” |
| Record Collector via Wikipediaby Peter Barry | 3/5 | 60 | 2023 | “Even within the context of Neil Young’s mid-70s output, Chrome Dreams comes with a particularly convoluted history. Bootlegged in the 90s (and given a” |
Every Sunday: the week's new albums, scored by the critics. Plus our own reviews when we post them. Free, and one click to leave.
From B-Side Guys
More from Neil Young
More Rock from around 1977
Would you spin it again?
Be the first to answer. Results show once 3 listeners weigh in.
How the Breakdown works
Every outlet’s score is converted to 0–100 (2/5 is 40, 5.9/10 is 59, a B+ is 88) and averaged. Grades follow the B-Side scale: A is 90–100, B 80–89, C 70–79, D 60–69, F below 60. Approval is the share of critics who scored it 75 or higher; the Breakdown shows green at 75 and up, red below. Divisiveness asks a different question: not how many critics liked it, but how close their scores are to each other. Five critics who all give it 50 are Unanimous, even though none of them liked it. The labels run Unanimous, Broad agreement, Some debate, Divided, and Contentious. Replay rate comes from listeners, not critics: yes counts fully, a few tracks counts half, no counts zero. The gist quotes each outlet’s own summary of its review. Published is the date on the review itself, read from the outlet’s page, so you can see whether an album’s reputation came at release or years later. Scores marked est. come from reviews that publish no number. Scores marked via Wikipedia are archive ratings, mostly for older albums, taken from the “Professional ratings” box on the album’s Wikipedia page (published openly through Wikidata); each links to the original review when we can find it online, and to that Wikipedia entry when we can’t. When an outlet reviewed an album twice, years apart (often for a reissue), both scores count, each labeled with its year.
A-Side marks the critics’ top tier. An album earns it automatically, from its numbers alone: a Breakdown of 90 or higher, from at least 5 reviews, with at least 75% approval. Nobody hands it out and nobody can buy it; if new reviews pull an album below the line, it loses the badge.










Leave a Reply