Good News for People Who Love Bad News

Modest Mouse – Good News for People Who Love Bad News: B-Side Breakdown 81 (B-) from 8 critic reviews.

Album cover for Good News for People Who Love Bad News by Modest Mouse
Released April 5, 2004
Shop on AmazonAs an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.
Modest Mouse

Good News for People Who Love Bad News

81
B-Side BreakdownGrade B- · 8 critics · 88% approval
B-Side Breakdown81Grade: B-
Approval88%7 of 8 critics scored it 75 or higher
DivisivenessBroad agreementHow close the scores are: most critics land within 18 points of each other

Based on 8 reviews from outlets we track. Scores run 60 to 90.

By the numbers: Modest Mouse's best-reviewed album here since The Lonesome Crowded West (1997). 7 of 8 critics liked it, with The Guardian the lone holdout at 60.

020406080100The Guardian: 60Pitchfork: 79Rolling Stone: 80Q: 80Mojo: 80Entertainment Weekly: 88NME: 90AllMusic: 90 Breakdown 81
The gist
NME via Wikipedia 9/10 90
AllMusic via Wikipediaby Heather Phares 4.5/5 90
Entertainment Weekly via Wikipediaby Jem Aswad B+ 88
Rolling Stone via Wikipediaby Barry Walters 4/5 80 2004 “Check out our album review of Artist's Good News For People Who Love Bad News on Rolling Stone.com.”
Q via Wikipedia 4/5 80 2004
Mojo via Wikipedia 4/5 80 2004
Pitchfork via Wikipediaby Matt LeMay 7.9/10 79 2004 “Early in their career, Modest Mouse accomplished what may be the ultimate goal of any band: to forge a…”
The Guardian via Wikipediaby Caroline Sullivan 3/5 60 2004

From B-Side Guys

More from Modest Mouse

See all Modest Mouse albums ranked

More Indie & Alternative from around 2004

Would you spin it again?

Be the first to answer. Results show once 3 listeners weigh in.

How the Breakdown works

Every outlet’s score is converted to 0–100 (2/5 is 40, 5.9/10 is 59, a B+ is 88) and averaged. Grades follow the B-Side scale: A is 90–100, B 80–89, C 70–79, D 60–69, F below 60. Approval is the share of critics who scored it 75 or higher; the Breakdown shows green at 75 and up, red below. Divisiveness asks a different question: not how many critics liked it, but how close their scores are to each other. Five critics who all give it 50 are Unanimous, even though none of them liked it. The labels run Unanimous, Broad agreement, Some debate, Divided, and Contentious. Replay rate comes from listeners, not critics: yes counts fully, a few tracks counts half, no counts zero. The gist quotes each outlet’s own summary of its review. Published is the date on the review itself, read from the outlet’s page, so you can see whether an album’s reputation came at release or years later. Scores marked est. come from reviews that publish no number. Scores marked via Wikipedia are archive ratings, mostly for older albums, taken from the “Professional ratings” box on the album’s Wikipedia page (published openly through Wikidata); each links to the original review when we can find it online, and to that Wikipedia entry when we can’t. When an outlet reviewed an album twice, years apart (often for a reissue), both scores count, each labeled with its year.

A-Side marks the critics’ top tier. An album earns it automatically, from its numbers alone: a Breakdown of 90 or higher, from at least 5 reviews, with at least 75% approval. Nobody hands it out and nobody can buy it; if new reviews pull an album below the line, it loses the badge.

Report a problem

Tags:

Leave a Reply