Based on 10 reviews from outlets we track. Scores run 50 to 95.
By the numbers: Modest Mouse's best-reviewed album here since We Were Dead Before the Ship Even Sank (2007). Scores ran from 50 (Spin) to 95 (Entertainment Weekly).
| The gist | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Entertainment Weekly via Wikipediaby Miles Raymer | A | 95 | ||
| The A.V. Club via Wikipediaby Zach Schonfeld | B+ | 88 | 2022 | |
| Uncut via Wikipedia | 8/10 | 80 | 2014 | |
| Rolling Stone via Wikipediaby David Fricke | 3.5/5 | 70 | 2015 | “Check out our album review of Artist's Strangers to Ourselves on Rolling Stone.com.” |
| NME via Wikipediaby Al Horner | 7/10 | 70 | 2015 | “Modest Mouse’s 22-year career to date is something of a Cinderella story. Despite a frontman in throaty philosopher Isaac Brock who sounds like Tom Waits shouting into a wood-chipper; despite…” |
| Pitchfork via Wikipediaby Jayson Greene | 6.4/10 | 64 | 2015 | “Modest Mouse have been working on their new album for longer than many bands have existed. After reports of bizarre guest spots, shifting producers, and the departure of founding bassist…” |
| Q via Wikipediaby Victoria Segal | 3/5 | 60 | 2014 | |
| The Guardian via Wikipediaby Tim Jonze | 3/5 | 60 | 2015 | “Isaac Brock’s pal-up with Outkast’s Big Boi suggested Modest Mouse’s new album might be something quite different – but it’s really not” |
| AllMusic via Wikipediaby Stephen Thomas Erlewine | 3/5 | 60 | ||
| Spin via Wikipediaby Kyle McGovern | 5/10 | 50 | 2015 | “5SPIN Rating: 5 of 10Release Date: March 16, 2015Label: EpicEight years and this is it? After several false starts, reports of curious collaborations with” |
Every Sunday: the week's new albums, scored by the critics. Plus our own reviews when we post them. Free, and one click to leave.
From B-Side Guys
- More on Modest MouseVideo of the Day: Johnny Raincloud “White Noize”
More from Modest Mouse
More Indie & Alternative from around 2015
Would you spin it again?
Be the first to answer. Results show once 3 listeners weigh in.
How the Breakdown works
Every outlet’s score is converted to 0–100 (2/5 is 40, 5.9/10 is 59, a B+ is 88) and averaged. Grades follow the B-Side scale: A is 90–100, B 80–89, C 70–79, D 60–69, F below 60. Approval is the share of critics who scored it 75 or higher; the Breakdown shows green at 75 and up, red below. Divisiveness asks a different question: not how many critics liked it, but how close their scores are to each other. Five critics who all give it 50 are Unanimous, even though none of them liked it. The labels run Unanimous, Broad agreement, Some debate, Divided, and Contentious. Replay rate comes from listeners, not critics: yes counts fully, a few tracks counts half, no counts zero. The gist quotes each outlet’s own summary of its review. Published is the date on the review itself, read from the outlet’s page, so you can see whether an album’s reputation came at release or years later. Scores marked est. come from reviews that publish no number. Scores marked via Wikipedia are archive ratings, mostly for older albums, taken from the “Professional ratings” box on the album’s Wikipedia page (published openly through Wikidata); each links to the original review when we can find it online, and to that Wikipedia entry when we can’t. When an outlet reviewed an album twice, years apart (often for a reissue), both scores count, each labeled with its year.
A-Side marks the critics’ top tier. An album earns it automatically, from its numbers alone: a Breakdown of 90 or higher, from at least 5 reviews, with at least 75% approval. Nobody hands it out and nobody can buy it; if new reviews pull an album below the line, it loses the badge.









Leave a Reply