Critics give Suspended Animation a B-Side Breakdown of 77 (C+), from 9 reviews at outlets we track. Scores run 58 to 90.
The verdict on Suspended Animation
6 of 9 critics liked it. A mixed reception.
- Highest 90 Tiny Mix Tapes and AllMusic
- Lowest 58 Pitchfork
- Career #2 of Fantômas's 3 albums with a Breakdown
- By the numbers Fantômas's best-reviewed album here since The Director’s Cut (2001).
| The gist | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tiny Mix Tapes via Wikipedia | 4.5/5 | 90 | ||
| AllMusic via Wikipedia | 4.5/5 | 90 | 2005 | |
| Stylus Magazine via Wikipediaby Scott McKeating | B | 85 | 2005 | |
| Uncut via Wikipedia | 4/5 | 80 | 2005 | |
| PopMatters via Wikipediaby Adrien Begrand | 8/10 | 80 | 2005 | “Fantomas's 2004 opus Delirium Cordia ranks as one of the scariest albums to be unleashed upon the public in recent memory, a single-track, 74-minute” |
| Alternative Press via Wikipedia | 4/5 | 80 | 2005 | |
| Drowned in Sound via Wikipediaby Mike Diver | 7/10 | 70 | 2005 | “…rampant run-throughs of what Looney Tunes would sound like if Bugs Bunny’s high-jinx were soundtracked by The Locust…” |
| Rolling Stone via Wikipediaby David Fricke | 3/5 | 60 | 2005 | |
| Pitchfork via Wikipediaby Adam Moerder | 5.8/10 | 58 | 2005 | “Ipecac band follows its one-track, 74-minute LP with a record that squeezes 30 songs into less than three-quarters of an hour.” |
Every Sunday: the week's new albums, scored by the critics. Plus our own reviews when we post them. Free, and one click to leave.
More from Fantômas
More Rock from around 2005
Would you spin it again?
Be the first to answer. Results show once 3 listeners weigh in.
How the Breakdown works
Every outlet’s score is converted to 0–100 (2/5 is 40, 5.9/10 is 59, a B+ is 88) and averaged. Grades follow the B-Side scale: A is 90–100, B 80–89, C 70–79, D 60–69, F below 60. Approval is the share of critics who scored it 75 or higher; the Breakdown shows green at 75 and up, red below. Divisiveness asks a different question: not how many critics liked it, but how close their scores are to each other. Five critics who all give it 50 are Unanimous, even though none of them liked it. The labels run Unanimous, Broad agreement, Some debate, Divided, and Contentious. Replay rate comes from listeners, not critics: yes counts fully, a few tracks counts half, no counts zero. The gist quotes each outlet’s own summary of its review. Published is the date on the review itself, read from the outlet’s page, so you can see whether an album’s reputation came at release or years later. Scores marked est. come from reviews that publish no number. Scores marked via Wikipedia are archive ratings, mostly for older albums, taken from the “Professional ratings” box on the album’s Wikipedia page (published openly through Wikidata); each links to the original review when we can find it online, and to that Wikipedia entry when we can’t. When an outlet reviewed an album twice, years apart (often for a reissue), both scores count, each labeled with its year.
A-Side marks the critics’ top tier. An album earns it automatically, from its numbers alone: a Breakdown of 90 or higher, from at least 5 reviews, with at least 75% approval. Nobody hands it out and nobody can buy it; if new reviews pull an album below the line, it loses the badge.






Leave a Reply