Suspended Animation

Fantômas – Suspended Animation: B-Side Breakdown 77 (C+) from 9 critic reviews.

Album cover for Suspended Animation by Fantômas
Released April 5, 2005
Shop on AmazonAs an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.
Fantômas

Suspended Animation

77
B-Side BreakdownGrade C+ · 9 critics · 67% approval
B-Side Breakdown77Grade: C+
Approval67%6 of 9 critics scored it 75 or higher
DivisivenessSome debateHow close the scores are: most critics land within 22 points of each other

Critics give Suspended Animation a B-Side Breakdown of 77 (C+), from 9 reviews at outlets we track. Scores run 58 to 90.

The verdict on Suspended Animation

6 of 9 critics liked it. A mixed reception.

020406080100Pitchfork: 58Rolling Stone: 60Drowned in Sound: 70Uncut: 80PopMatters: 80Alternative Press: 80Stylus Magazine: 85Tiny Mix Tapes: 90AllMusic: 90 Breakdown 77
The gist
Tiny Mix Tapes via Wikipedia 4.5/5 90
AllMusic via Wikipedia 4.5/5 90 2005
Stylus Magazine via Wikipediaby Scott McKeating B 85 2005
Uncut via Wikipedia 4/5 80 2005
PopMatters via Wikipediaby Adrien Begrand 8/10 80 2005 “Fantomas's 2004 opus Delirium Cordia ranks as one of the scariest albums to be unleashed upon the public in recent memory, a single-track, 74-minute”
Alternative Press via Wikipedia 4/5 80 2005
Drowned in Sound via Wikipediaby Mike Diver 7/10 70 2005 “…rampant run-throughs of what Looney Tunes would sound like if Bugs Bunny’s high-jinx were soundtracked by The Locust…”
Rolling Stone via Wikipediaby David Fricke 3/5 60 2005
Pitchfork via Wikipediaby Adam Moerder 5.8/10 58 2005 “Ipecac band follows its one-track, 74-minute LP with a record that squeezes 30 songs into less than three-quarters of an hour.”

More from Fantômas

See all Fantômas albums ranked

More Rock from around 2005

Would you spin it again?

Be the first to answer. Results show once 3 listeners weigh in.

How the Breakdown works

Every outlet’s score is converted to 0–100 (2/5 is 40, 5.9/10 is 59, a B+ is 88) and averaged. Grades follow the B-Side scale: A is 90–100, B 80–89, C 70–79, D 60–69, F below 60. Approval is the share of critics who scored it 75 or higher; the Breakdown shows green at 75 and up, red below. Divisiveness asks a different question: not how many critics liked it, but how close their scores are to each other. Five critics who all give it 50 are Unanimous, even though none of them liked it. The labels run Unanimous, Broad agreement, Some debate, Divided, and Contentious. Replay rate comes from listeners, not critics: yes counts fully, a few tracks counts half, no counts zero. The gist quotes each outlet’s own summary of its review. Published is the date on the review itself, read from the outlet’s page, so you can see whether an album’s reputation came at release or years later. Scores marked est. come from reviews that publish no number. Scores marked via Wikipedia are archive ratings, mostly for older albums, taken from the “Professional ratings” box on the album’s Wikipedia page (published openly through Wikidata); each links to the original review when we can find it online, and to that Wikipedia entry when we can’t. When an outlet reviewed an album twice, years apart (often for a reissue), both scores count, each labeled with its year.

A-Side marks the critics’ top tier. An album earns it automatically, from its numbers alone: a Breakdown of 90 or higher, from at least 5 reviews, with at least 75% approval. Nobody hands it out and nobody can buy it; if new reviews pull an album below the line, it loses the badge.

Report a problem


Discover more from B-Side Guys

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

Tags:

Leave a Reply