The Director’s Cut

Fantômas – The Director’s Cut: B-Side Breakdown 82 (B-) from 6 critic reviews.

Album cover for The Director’s Cut by Fantômas
Released July 9, 2001
Shop on AmazonAs an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.
Fantômas

The Director’s Cut

82
B-Side BreakdownGrade B- · 6 critics · 100% approval
B-Side Breakdown82Grade: B-
Approval100%6 of 6 critics scored it 75 or higher
DivisivenessUnanimousHow close the scores are: most critics land within 8 points of each other

Early reviews. Critics give The Director’s Cut an early B-Side Breakdown of 82 (B-), from 6 reviews so far. It will settle as more outlets weigh in.

The verdict on The Director’s Cut

6 of 6 critics liked it, and they mostly agree.

  • Highest 90 Drowned in Sound
  • Lowest 80 Tiny Mix Tapes, NME, Kerrang! and AllMusic
  • By the numbers The best-reviewed album of Fantômas's career on B-Side Breakdowns, ahead of Suspended Animation (77). The third best-reviewed Rock album of 2001 we've tracked.
020406080100Tiny Mix Tapes: 80NME: 80Kerrang!: 80AllMusic: 80Pitchfork: 84Drowned in Sound: 90 Breakdown 82
The gist
Drowned in Sound via Wikipediaby Graham Reed 9/10 90 2001 “Mike Patton sure does get around. In something like his second album in 3 months, this is taking the leftfield direction that Mike Patton started w…”
Pitchfork via Wikipediaby Brendan Reid 8.4/10 84 2001 “IN A WORLD WHERE MIKE PATTON SLICED AND DICED MUSICAL GENRES, NO ONE WAS PREPARED FOR… THE DIRECTOR'S CUT …”
Tiny Mix Tapes via Wikipedia 4/5 80
NME via Wikipediaby Noel Gardner 8/10 80 2005 “For Mike Patton, it’s all about walking the knife edge; dedicating oneself to doing the last thing people expect of you. When the scatological excesses of Faith No More became…”
Kerrang! via Wikipediaby Catherine Yates 4/5 80 2005
AllMusic via Wikipediaby Blake Butler 4/5 80

More from Fantômas

See all Fantômas albums ranked

More Rock from around 2001

Would you spin it again?

Be the first to answer. Results show once 3 listeners weigh in.

How the Breakdown works

Every outlet’s score is converted to 0–100 (2/5 is 40, 5.9/10 is 59, a B+ is 88) and averaged. Grades follow the B-Side scale: A is 90–100, B 80–89, C 70–79, D 60–69, F below 60. Approval is the share of critics who scored it 75 or higher; the Breakdown shows green at 75 and up, red below. Divisiveness asks a different question: not how many critics liked it, but how close their scores are to each other. Five critics who all give it 50 are Unanimous, even though none of them liked it. The labels run Unanimous, Broad agreement, Some debate, Divided, and Contentious. Replay rate comes from listeners, not critics: yes counts fully, a few tracks counts half, no counts zero. The gist quotes each outlet’s own summary of its review. Published is the date on the review itself, read from the outlet’s page, so you can see whether an album’s reputation came at release or years later. Scores marked est. come from reviews that publish no number. Scores marked via Wikipedia are archive ratings, mostly for older albums, taken from the “Professional ratings” box on the album’s Wikipedia page (published openly through Wikidata); each links to the original review when we can find it online, and to that Wikipedia entry when we can’t. When an outlet reviewed an album twice, years apart (often for a reissue), both scores count, each labeled with its year.

A-Side marks the critics’ top tier. An album earns it automatically, from its numbers alone: a Breakdown of 90 or higher, from at least 5 reviews, with at least 75% approval. Nobody hands it out and nobody can buy it; if new reviews pull an album below the line, it loses the badge.

Report a problem


Discover more from B-Side Guys

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

Tags:

Leave a Reply