Delìrium Còrdia

Fantômas – Delìrium Còrdia: B-Side Breakdown 62 (D-) from 9 critic reviews.

Album cover for Delìrium Còrdia by Fantômas
Released 2003
Shop on AmazonAs an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.
Fantômas

Delìrium Còrdia

62
B-Side BreakdownGrade D- · 9 critics · 44% approval
B-Side Breakdown62Grade: D-
Approval44%4 of 9 critics scored it 75 or higher
DivisivenessContentiousHow close the scores are: most critics land within 44 points of each other

Critics give Delìrium Còrdia a B-Side Breakdown of 62 (D-), from 9 reviews at outlets we track. Scores run 20 to 88.

The verdict on Delìrium Còrdia

Critics split on this one: scores run from 20 (Q) to 88 (Stylus Magazine).

020406080100Q: 20Alternative Press: 30Pitchfork: 59Sputnikmusic: 60Rolling Stone: 60Tiny Mix Tapes: 80Uncut: 80AllMusic: 80Stylus Magazine: 88 Breakdown 62
The gist
Stylus Magazine via Wikipedia B+ 88 2004
Tiny Mix Tapes via Wikipedia 4/5 80
Uncut via Wikipedia 4/5 80 2005
AllMusic via Wikipedia 4/5 80
Sputnikmusic via Wikipedia 3.0/5 60 2004 “Fantomas – Delìrium Còrdia review by Med57: The Band: Mike Patton (Vocal sounds) Buzz Osbourne (Guitars) Trevor Dunn (Bass) Dave Lombardo (Drums) Released: 2004 (Ipecac) Imagine being…”
Rolling Stone via Wikipedia 3/5 60
Pitchfork via Wikipedia 5.9/10 59 2004
Alternative Press via Wikipedia 1.5/5 30 2005
Q via Wikipedia 1/5 20 2005

More from Fantômas

See all Fantômas albums ranked

More Rock from around 2003

Would you spin it again?

Be the first to answer. Results show once 3 listeners weigh in.

How the Breakdown works

Every outlet’s score is converted to 0–100 (2/5 is 40, 5.9/10 is 59, a B+ is 88) and averaged. Grades follow the B-Side scale: A is 90–100, B 80–89, C 70–79, D 60–69, F below 60. Approval is the share of critics who scored it 75 or higher; the Breakdown shows green at 75 and up, red below. Divisiveness asks a different question: not how many critics liked it, but how close their scores are to each other. Five critics who all give it 50 are Unanimous, even though none of them liked it. The labels run Unanimous, Broad agreement, Some debate, Divided, and Contentious. Replay rate comes from listeners, not critics: yes counts fully, a few tracks counts half, no counts zero. The gist quotes each outlet’s own summary of its review. Published is the date on the review itself, read from the outlet’s page, so you can see whether an album’s reputation came at release or years later. Scores marked est. come from reviews that publish no number. Scores marked via Wikipedia are archive ratings, mostly for older albums, taken from the “Professional ratings” box on the album’s Wikipedia page (published openly through Wikidata); each links to the original review when we can find it online, and to that Wikipedia entry when we can’t. When an outlet reviewed an album twice, years apart (often for a reissue), both scores count, each labeled with its year.

A-Side marks the critics’ top tier. An album earns it automatically, from its numbers alone: a Breakdown of 90 or higher, from at least 5 reviews, with at least 75% approval. Nobody hands it out and nobody can buy it; if new reviews pull an album below the line, it loses the badge.

Report a problem


Discover more from B-Side Guys

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

Tags:

Leave a Reply