Based on 9 reviews from outlets we track. Scores run 68 to 100.
By the numbers: The best-reviewed album of Florence + the Machine's career on B-Side Breakdowns, ahead of Dance Fever (81). The sixth best-reviewed album of 2025 we've tracked.
| The gist | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| NME via Wikipediaby Laura Molloy | 5/5 | 100 | Oct 31, 2025 | “On her sixth album as Florence + The Machine, Florence Welch enlists horror and magic to harness hope” |
| musicOMH via Wikipediaby John Murphy | 4.5/5 | 90 | Nov 2, 2025 | “An urgent and vital testimony to survival and rebirth, Florence Welch's sixth album is a defiant middle finger to doubters” |
| Consequence via Wikipediaby Paolo Ragusa | B+ | 88 | Oct 31, 2025 | “On their new album Everybody Scream, Florence + the Machine reprise their signature sound and rise from the ashes.” |
| Rolling Stone via Wikipediaby Maura Johnston | 4/5 | 80 | Nov 1, 2025 | “Florence + the Machine’s sixth album Everybody Scream turns a traumatic experience into an artistic triumph” |
| The Independent via Wikipediaby Roisin O'Connor | 4/5 | 80 | Oct 31, 2025 | “Inspired by a near-death experience, Florence Welch conjures up a fantastic collection of songs that find her wrestling with her role as a performer, her status among ‘the greats’, and…” |
| The Line of Best Fit via Wikipediaby Tanatat Khuttapan | 8/10 | 80 | Oct 31, 2025 | “Emanating with radiant energy, Everybody Scream finds Florence + the Machine feeding on their unruliest impulses yet.” |
| The Guardian via Wikipediaby Alexis Petridis | 4/5 | 80 | Oct 31, 2025 | “On her self-deprecating, viscera-flecked sixth record, Florence Welch picks apart the compulsions and contradictions of fame” |
| AllMusic via Wikipediaby Neil Z. Yeung | 4.0/5 | 80 | ||
| Pitchfork via Wikipediaby Jaeden Pinder | 6.8/10 | 68 | Nov 4, 2025 |
Every Sunday: the week's new albums, scored by the critics. Plus our own reviews when we post them. Free, and one click to leave.
More from Florence + the Machine
More Indie & Alternative from around 2025
Would you spin it again?
Be the first to answer. Results show once 3 listeners weigh in.
How the Breakdown works
Every outlet’s score is converted to 0–100 (2/5 is 40, 5.9/10 is 59, a B+ is 88) and averaged. Grades follow the B-Side scale: A is 90–100, B 80–89, C 70–79, D 60–69, F below 60. Approval is the share of critics who scored it 75 or higher; the Breakdown shows green at 75 and up, red below. Divisiveness asks a different question: not how many critics liked it, but how close their scores are to each other. Five critics who all give it 50 are Unanimous, even though none of them liked it. The labels run Unanimous, Broad agreement, Some debate, Divided, and Contentious. Replay rate comes from listeners, not critics: yes counts fully, a few tracks counts half, no counts zero. The gist quotes each outlet’s own summary of its review. Published is the date on the review itself, read from the outlet’s page, so you can see whether an album’s reputation came at release or years later. Scores marked est. come from reviews that publish no number. Scores marked via Wikipedia are archive ratings, mostly for older albums, taken from the “Professional ratings” box on the album’s Wikipedia page (published openly through Wikidata); each links to the original review when we can find it online, and to that Wikipedia entry when we can’t. When an outlet reviewed an album twice, years apart (often for a reissue), both scores count, each labeled with its year.
A-Side marks the critics’ top tier. An album earns it automatically, from its numbers alone: a Breakdown of 90 or higher, from at least 5 reviews, with at least 75% approval. Nobody hands it out and nobody can buy it; if new reviews pull an album below the line, it loses the badge.






Leave a Reply