Ceremonials

Florence + the Machine – Ceremonials: B-Side Breakdown 77 (C+) from 12 critic reviews.

Album cover for Ceremonials by Florence + the Machine
Released October 28, 2011
Shop on AmazonAs an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.
Florence + the Machine

Ceremonials

77
B-Side BreakdownGrade C+ · 12 critics · 58% approval
B-Side Breakdown77Grade: C+
Approval58%7 of 12 critics scored it 75 or higher
DivisivenessSome debateHow close the scores are: most critics land within 26 points of each other

Based on 12 reviews from outlets we track. Scores run 60 to 100.

By the numbers: The best-reviewed album of Florence + the Machine's career on B-Side Breakdowns, ahead of How Big, How Blue, How Beautiful (76). Scores ran from 60 (The Independent) to 100 (AllMusic).

020406080100Pitchfork: 60The Guardian: 60The Independent: 60Beats Per Minute: 63Spectrum Culture: 72Spin: 80NME: 80Rolling Stone: 80The Telegraph: 80Los Angeles Times: 88Entertainment Weekly: 95AllMusic: 100 Breakdown 77
The gist
AllMusic via Wikipedia 5/5 100
Entertainment Weekly via Wikipedia A 95
Los Angeles Times via Wikipedia 3.5/4 88 2011
Spin via Wikipedia 8/10 80 2011
NME via Wikipedia 8/10 80 2011
Rolling Stone via Wikipedia 4/5 80 2011
The Telegraph via Wikipedia 4/5 80
Spectrum Cultureby Katie Bolton 3.6/5 72 2011 “Florence + the Machine Ceremonials Rating: 3.6/5.0 Label: Universal Republic Florence Welch has the best female voice in current pop music. She eschews the thin nasality of the untrained vocalist…”
Beats Per Minuteby Rob Hakimian 63% 63 2011 “Music News, Reviews, Interviews, Videos and MP3s”
Pitchfork via Wikipedia 6.0/10 60 2011
The Guardian via Wikipedia 3/5 60 2011
The Independent via Wikipedia 3/5 60 2011

More from Florence + the Machine

See all Florence + the Machine albums ranked

More Indie & Alternative from around 2011

Would you spin it again?

Be the first to answer. Results show once 3 listeners weigh in.

How the Breakdown works

Every outlet’s score is converted to 0–100 (2/5 is 40, 5.9/10 is 59, a B+ is 88) and averaged. Grades follow the B-Side scale: A is 90–100, B 80–89, C 70–79, D 60–69, F below 60. Approval is the share of critics who scored it 75 or higher; the Breakdown shows green at 75 and up, red below. Divisiveness asks a different question: not how many critics liked it, but how close their scores are to each other. Five critics who all give it 50 are Unanimous, even though none of them liked it. The labels run Unanimous, Broad agreement, Some debate, Divided, and Contentious. Replay rate comes from listeners, not critics: yes counts fully, a few tracks counts half, no counts zero. The gist quotes each outlet’s own summary of its review. Published is the date on the review itself, read from the outlet’s page, so you can see whether an album’s reputation came at release or years later. Scores marked est. come from reviews that publish no number. Scores marked via Wikipedia are archive ratings, mostly for older albums, taken from the “Professional ratings” box on the album’s Wikipedia page (published openly through Wikidata); each links to the original review when we can find it online, and to that Wikipedia entry when we can’t. When an outlet reviewed an album twice, years apart (often for a reissue), both scores count, each labeled with its year.

A-Side marks the critics’ top tier. An album earns it automatically, from its numbers alone: a Breakdown of 90 or higher, from at least 5 reviews, with at least 75% approval. Nobody hands it out and nobody can buy it; if new reviews pull an album below the line, it loses the badge.

Report a problem

Tags:

Leave a Reply