Leaders of the Free World

Elbow – Leaders of the Free World: B-Side Breakdown 74 (Keeper) from 12 critic reviews.

Album cover for Leaders of the Free World by Elbow
Released January 1, 2005
Shop on AmazonAs an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.
Elbow

Leaders of the Free World

74
B-Side BreakdownKeeper · 12 critics · 67% approval
B-Side Breakdown74Keeper
Approval67%8 of 12 critics scored it 70 or higher
DivisivenessSome debateHow close the scores are: most critics land within 28 points of each other

Critics give Leaders of the Free World a B-Side Breakdown of 74 (Keeper), from 12 reviews at outlets we track. Scores run 40 to 90.

The verdict on Leaders of the Free World

8 of 12 critics liked it. A mixed reception.

  • Highest 90 NME
  • Outlier 40 Rolling Stone, 20 points below the next-lowest score
  • By the numbers The lowest score of Elbow's 10 albums with a Breakdown.
020406080100Rolling Stone: 40Slant: 60The Independent: 60Pitchfork: 62PopMatters: 80Q: 80The Guardian: 80AllMusic: 80Spin: 85The A.V. Club: 85Entertainment Weekly: 85NME: 90 Breakdown 74
The gist
NME via Wikipediaby Cat Goodwin 9/10 90 2005 “Elbow’s Guy Garvey isn’t your average pop star. A romantic grump with the voice of a cherub, he makes no attempt to cover up his thirtysomething years with a fake…”
Spin via Wikipedia A- 85 2006
The A.V. Club via Wikipediaby Saloni Gajjar A- 85 2022 “The A.V. Club digs deep into film, TV, music, games, books and more.”
Entertainment Weekly via Wikipediaby Raymond Fiore A- 85 2005
PopMattersby Michael Lomas 8/10 80 2006 “Leaders of the Free World is an ambitious and beautiful album that confirms Elbow as one of the bands of our generation. It's truly a record to treasure.”
Q via Wikipedia 4/5 80 2005
The Guardian via Wikipediaby Caroline Sullivan 4/5 80 2005
AllMusic via Wikipediaby MacKenzie Wilson 4/5 80
Pitchfork via Wikipediaby Rachel Khong 6.2/10 62 2005 “Elbow slides from engaging to naval-gazing on their third full-length.”
Slantby Eric Henderson 3/5 60 2006 “Is anyone surprised when self-loathing seekers of post-ironic self-delusion turn on their own?”
The Independent via Wikipediaby Andy Gill 3/5 60 2005 “Leaders of the Free World, V”
Rolling Stone via Wikipediaby Barry Walters 2/5 40 2006

Leaders of the Free World in Elbow's catalog

70Asleep in the Back (2001): 7676Cast of Thousands (2003): 7878Leaders of the Free World (2005): 7474This oneThe Seldom Seen Kid (2008): 8181Build a Rocket Boys! (2011): 8181The Take Off and Landing of Everything (2014): 7979Little Fictions (2017): 8080Giants of All Sizes (2019): 8080Flying Dream 1 (2021): 7979Audio Vertigo (2024): 828220012024
Elbow's albums by B-Side Breakdown, in release order. Above the dashed line, most critics liked it. Every Elbow album, ranked

How these critics usually treat Elbow

  • NME Kinder than usual18 points above the other critics here. Usually 1 point below on Elbow's other albums (7).
  • Slant Harsher than usual15 points below the other critics here. Usually level with the others on Elbow's other albums (3).
  • Spin Kinder than usual12 points above the other critics here. Usually 3 points below on Elbow's other albums (4).
  • AllMusic Kinder than usual7 points above the other critics here. Usually 4 points below on Elbow's other albums (7).
  • The Independent Harsher than usual15 points below the other critics here. Usually 5 points below on Elbow's other albums (5).
  • PopMatters Kinder than usual7 points above the other critics here. Usually 3 points below on Elbow's other albums (4).

More from Elbow

See all Elbow albums ranked

More Rock from around 2005

Would you spin it again?

Be the first to answer. Results show once 3 listeners weigh in.

How the Breakdown works

Every outlet’s score is converted to 0–100 (2/5 is 40, 5.9/10 is 59) and averaged. A letter grade counts as the star rating it matches across thousands of reviews of the same albums, so a B+ is 75, like four stars, and a B is 65. Verdicts: Heavy Rotation is 85 and up, Keeper 70–84, Mixed Bag 55–69, Back of the Crate below 55. Approval is the share of critics who scored it 70 or higher (7/10, three and a half stars); the Breakdown shows green at 70 and up, red below. Divisiveness asks a different question: not how many critics liked it, but how close their scores are to each other. Five critics who all give it 50 are Unanimous, even though none of them liked it. The labels run Unanimous, Broad agreement, Some debate, Divided, and Contentious. Replay rate comes from listeners, not critics: yes counts fully, a few tracks counts half, no counts zero. The gist quotes each outlet’s own summary of its review. Published is the date on the review itself, read from the outlet’s page, so you can see whether an album’s reputation came at release or years later. Scores marked est. come from reviews that publish no number. Scores marked via Wikipedia are archive ratings, mostly for older albums, taken from the “Professional ratings” box on the album’s Wikipedia page (published openly through Wikidata); each links to the original review when we can find it online, and to that Wikipedia entry when we can’t. When an outlet reviewed an album twice, years apart (often for a reissue), both scores count, each labeled with its year.

A-Side marks the critics’ top tier. An album earns it automatically, from its numbers alone: a Breakdown of 90 or higher, from at least 5 reviews, with at least 75% approval. Nobody hands it out and nobody can buy it; if new reviews pull an album below the line, it loses the badge.

Report a problem


Discover more from B-Side Guys

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

Tags:

Leave a Reply