Critics give Audio Vertigo a B-Side Breakdown of 82 (Keeper), from 9 reviews at outlets we track. Scores run 60 to 100.
The verdict on Audio Vertigo
Most critics loved it: 8 of 9 liked it.
- Highest 100 The Arts Desk
- Outlier 60 The Independent, 20 points below the next-lowest score
- By the numbers The best-reviewed album of Elbow's career on B-Side Breakdowns, ahead of The Seldom Seen Kid (81).
| The gist | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| The Arts Desk via Wikipediaby Kathryn Reilly | 5/5 | 100 | 2024 | “On this, their 10th album, the melodious Mancunians started at the drum kit and built from there. This is no bad thing.” |
| Clash via Wikipediaby Christopher Connor | 9/10 | 90 | 2024 | “elbow have been at the bedrock of the British Indie scene for over 20 years, with a winning blend of soaring festival singalong anthems like 'One Day Like” |
| Louder via Wikipediaby Chris Roberts | 9/10 | 90 | 2024 | “The energy and buoyancy never sacrifice Elbow's innate knack for emotional impact” |
| Under the Radar via Wikipedia | 8/10 | 80 | 2024 | “Rock chameleons Elbow are always looking to push the envelope and explore new directions regardless of genre, as long as the outcome is great music.” |
| Uncut via Wikipediaby John Lewis | 8/10 | 80 | 2024 | |
| NME via Wikipediaby Andrew Trendell | 4/5 | 80 | 2024 | “Manchester everymen Elbow shake off their Sunday roast image for a spicy and hefty 10th album on 'Audio Vertigo” |
| Mojo via Wikipediaby James McNair | 4/5 | 80 | 2024 | |
| The Guardian via Wikipediaby Dave Simpson | 4/5 | 80 | 2024 | “The band’s 10th album incorporates African and South American rhythms and instrumentation alongside Guy Garvey’s darkest, funniest lyrics for years” |
| The Independent via Wikipediaby Annabel Nugent | 3/5 | 60 | 2024 | “Shakira swaps revenge for something more nuanced, while Waxahatchee and Adrianne Lenker double down on their previous albums’ brilliance, and Elbow return to the spare melodies and dark moods of…” |
Every Sunday: the week's new albums, scored by the critics. Plus our own reviews when we post them. Free, and one click to leave.
Audio Vertigo in Elbow's catalog
How these critics usually treat Elbow
- The Independent Harsher than usual25 points below the other critics here. Usually 3 points below on Elbow's other albums (5).
- Uncut About usual for them3 points below the other critics here. Usually 4 points above on Elbow's other albums (5).
- NME About usual for them3 points below the other critics here. Usually 2 points above on Elbow's other albums (7).
- The Guardian About usual for them3 points below the other critics here. Usually 2 points above on Elbow's other albums (8).
- Mojo About usual for them3 points below the other critics here. Usually level with the others on Elbow's other albums (4).
More from Elbow
More Indie & Alternative from around 2024
Would you spin it again?
Be the first to answer. Results show once 3 listeners weigh in.
How the Breakdown works
Every outlet’s score is converted to 0–100 (2/5 is 40, 5.9/10 is 59) and averaged. A letter grade counts as the star rating it matches across thousands of reviews of the same albums, so a B+ is 75, like four stars, and a B is 65. Verdicts: Heavy Rotation is 85 and up, Keeper 70–84, Mixed Bag 55–69, Back of the Crate below 55. Approval is the share of critics who scored it 70 or higher (7/10, three and a half stars); the Breakdown shows green at 70 and up, red below. Divisiveness asks a different question: not how many critics liked it, but how close their scores are to each other. Five critics who all give it 50 are Unanimous, even though none of them liked it. The labels run Unanimous, Broad agreement, Some debate, Divided, and Contentious. Replay rate comes from listeners, not critics: yes counts fully, a few tracks counts half, no counts zero. The gist quotes each outlet’s own summary of its review. Published is the date on the review itself, read from the outlet’s page, so you can see whether an album’s reputation came at release or years later. Scores marked est. come from reviews that publish no number. Scores marked via Wikipedia are archive ratings, mostly for older albums, taken from the “Professional ratings” box on the album’s Wikipedia page (published openly through Wikidata); each links to the original review when we can find it online, and to that Wikipedia entry when we can’t. When an outlet reviewed an album twice, years apart (often for a reissue), both scores count, each labeled with its year.
A-Side marks the critics’ top tier. An album earns it automatically, from its numbers alone: a Breakdown of 90 or higher, from at least 5 reviews, with at least 75% approval. Nobody hands it out and nobody can buy it; if new reviews pull an album below the line, it loses the badge.










Leave a Reply