Asleep in the Back

Elbow – Asleep in the Back: B-Side Breakdown 76 (Keeper) from 11 critic reviews.

Album cover for Asleep in the Back by Elbow
Released May 2, 2001
Shop on AmazonAs an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.
Elbow

Asleep in the Back

76
B-Side BreakdownKeeper · 11 critics · 73% approval
B-Side Breakdown76Keeper
Approval73%8 of 11 critics scored it 70 or higher
DivisivenessSome debateHow close the scores are: most critics land within 22 points of each other

Critics give Asleep in the Back a B-Side Breakdown of 76 (Keeper), from 11 reviews at outlets we track. Scores run 59 to 90.

The verdict on Asleep in the Back

8 of 11 critics liked it. A mixed reception.

020406080100Entertainment Weekly: 59Spin: 60AllMusic: 60Pitchfork in 2002: 74Uncut: 80Q: 80The Guardian: 80The Telegraph: 80Pitchfork in 2009: 84Los Angeles Times: 88NME: 90 Breakdown 76
The gist
NME via Wikipediaby Ted Kessler 9/10 90 2005 “Hooray! Manchester has delivered its first great album of the millennium. Others will doubtless follow, but few will conjure up magic as brooding as [a]Elbow[/a] have here. Peering back through…”
Los Angeles Times via Wikipedia 3.5/4 88 2002 “*** BAD RELIGION "The Process of Belief" Epitaph God–however you choose (or not) to define that term–bless Bad Religion.”
Pitchfork in 2009 via Wikipediaby Ian Cohen 8.4/10 84 2009
Uncut via Wikipediaby Sharon O'Connell 4/5 80 2009
Q via Wikipedia 4/5 80 2005
The Guardian via Wikipediaby John Aizlewood 4/5 80 2001 “Take a walk on the dark side with Elbow, says John Aizlewood – it's heart-wrenching”
The Telegraph via Wikipediaby Andrew Perry 4/5 80 2009
Pitchfork in 2002 via Wikipediaby Joe Tangari 7.4/10 74 2002 “Bandnames are important. The best ones are good indicators of where a band is coming from and what they're …”
Spin via Wikipediaby Douglas Wolk 6/10 60 2002
AllMusic via Wikipediaby Andy Kellman 3/5 60
Entertainment Weekly via Wikipedia B- 59 2005

Asleep in the Back in Elbow's catalog

70Asleep in the Back (2001): 7676This oneCast of Thousands (2003): 7878Leaders of the Free World (2005): 7474The Seldom Seen Kid (2008): 8181Build a Rocket Boys! (2011): 8181The Take Off and Landing of Everything (2014): 7979Little Fictions (2017): 8080Giants of All Sizes (2019): 8080Flying Dream 1 (2021): 7979Audio Vertigo (2024): 82822024
Elbow's albums by B-Side Breakdown, in release order. Above the dashed line, most critics liked it. Every Elbow album, ranked

How these critics usually treat Elbow

  • Spin Harsher than usual17 points below the other critics here. Usually 4 points above on Elbow's other albums (4).
  • NME Kinder than usual17 points above the other critics here. Usually 1 point below on Elbow's other albums (7).
  • AllMusic Harsher than usual17 points below the other critics here. Usually level with the others on Elbow's other albums (7).
  • The Telegraph Harsher than usual5 points above the other critics here. Usually 15 points above on Elbow's other albums (3).
  • Pitchfork Kinder than usual1 point below the other critics here. Usually 9 points below on Elbow's other albums (5).
  • The Guardian About usual for them5 points above the other critics here. Usually 1 point above on Elbow's other albums (8).

More from Elbow

See all Elbow albums ranked

More Indie & Alternative from around 2001

Would you spin it again?

Be the first to answer. Results show once 3 listeners weigh in.

How the Breakdown works

Every outlet’s score is converted to 0–100 (2/5 is 40, 5.9/10 is 59) and averaged. A letter grade counts as the star rating it matches across thousands of reviews of the same albums, so a B+ is 75, like four stars, and a B is 65. Verdicts: Heavy Rotation is 85 and up, Keeper 70–84, Mixed Bag 55–69, Back of the Crate below 55. Approval is the share of critics who scored it 70 or higher (7/10, three and a half stars); the Breakdown shows green at 70 and up, red below. Divisiveness asks a different question: not how many critics liked it, but how close their scores are to each other. Five critics who all give it 50 are Unanimous, even though none of them liked it. The labels run Unanimous, Broad agreement, Some debate, Divided, and Contentious. Replay rate comes from listeners, not critics: yes counts fully, a few tracks counts half, no counts zero. The gist quotes each outlet’s own summary of its review. Published is the date on the review itself, read from the outlet’s page, so you can see whether an album’s reputation came at release or years later. Scores marked est. come from reviews that publish no number. Scores marked via Wikipedia are archive ratings, mostly for older albums, taken from the “Professional ratings” box on the album’s Wikipedia page (published openly through Wikidata); each links to the original review when we can find it online, and to that Wikipedia entry when we can’t. When an outlet reviewed an album twice, years apart (often for a reissue), both scores count, each labeled with its year.

A-Side marks the critics’ top tier. An album earns it automatically, from its numbers alone: a Breakdown of 90 or higher, from at least 5 reviews, with at least 75% approval. Nobody hands it out and nobody can buy it; if new reviews pull an album below the line, it loses the badge.

Report a problem


Discover more from B-Side Guys

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

Tags:

Leave a Reply