Continuum

John Mayer – Continuum: B-Side Breakdown 67 (D+) from 10 critic reviews.

Album cover for Continuum by John Mayer
Released September 9, 2006
Shop on AmazonAs an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.
John Mayer

Continuum

67
B-Side BreakdownGrade D+ · 10 critics · 50% approval
B-Side Breakdown67Grade: D+
Approval50%5 of 10 critics scored it 75 or higher
DivisivenessDividedHow close the scores are: most critics land within 34 points of each other

Based on 10 reviews from outlets we track. Scores run 40 to 90.

By the numbers: John Mayer's best-reviewed album here since Room for Squares (2001). Scores ran from 40 (Uncut) to 90 (AllMusic).

020406080100Q: 40Uncut: 40Slant: 50Los Angeles Times: 63PopMatters: 70Mojo: 80musicOMH: 80Rolling Stone: 80Entertainment Weekly: 81AllMusic: 90 Breakdown 67
The gist
AllMusic via Wikipedia 4.5/5 90
Entertainment Weekly via Wikipedia B- 81
Mojo via Wikipedia 4/5 80 2006
musicOMH via Wikipedia 4/5 80
Rolling Stone via Wikipedia 4/5 80 2006
PopMatters 7/10 70 2006 “John Mayer gets a bad rap. After three albums of quality singer/songwriter material, Mayer is still judged by two songs that don’t necessarily represent his”
Los Angeles Times via Wikipedia 2.5/4 63 2006 “John Mayer "Continuum" (Columbia) * * 1/2 JOHN MAYER is 28 years old, and he's facing mortality.”
Slantby Jonathan Keefe 2.5/5 50 2006 “Continuum just doesn’t convince as a heady, soulful rock album or as Mayer’s creative quantum leap forward.”
Q via Wikipedia 2/5 40 2006
Uncut via Wikipedia 2/5 40 2006

More from John Mayer

See all John Mayer albums ranked

More Pop from around 2006

Would you spin it again?

Be the first to answer. Results show once 3 listeners weigh in.

How the Breakdown works

Every outlet’s score is converted to 0–100 (2/5 is 40, 5.9/10 is 59, a B+ is 88) and averaged. Grades follow the B-Side scale: A is 90–100, B 80–89, C 70–79, D 60–69, F below 60. Approval is the share of critics who scored it 75 or higher; the Breakdown shows green at 75 and up, red below. Divisiveness asks a different question: not how many critics liked it, but how close their scores are to each other. Five critics who all give it 50 are Unanimous, even though none of them liked it. The labels run Unanimous, Broad agreement, Some debate, Divided, and Contentious. Replay rate comes from listeners, not critics: yes counts fully, a few tracks counts half, no counts zero. The gist quotes each outlet’s own summary of its review. Published is the date on the review itself, read from the outlet’s page, so you can see whether an album’s reputation came at release or years later. Scores marked est. come from reviews that publish no number. Scores marked via Wikipedia are archive ratings, mostly for older albums, taken from the “Professional ratings” box on the album’s Wikipedia page (published openly through Wikidata); each links to the original review when we can find it online, and to that Wikipedia entry when we can’t. When an outlet reviewed an album twice, years apart (often for a reissue), both scores count, each labeled with its year.

A-Side marks the critics’ top tier. An album earns it automatically, from its numbers alone: a Breakdown of 90 or higher, from at least 5 reviews, with at least 75% approval. Nobody hands it out and nobody can buy it; if new reviews pull an album below the line, it loses the badge.

Report a problem

Tags:

Leave a Reply