Battle Studies

John Mayer – Battle Studies: B-Side Breakdown 61 (D-) from 11 critic reviews.

Album cover for Battle Studies by John Mayer
Released November 16, 2009
Shop on AmazonAs an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.
John Mayer

Battle Studies

61
B-Side BreakdownGrade D- · 11 critics · 18% approval
B-Side Breakdown61Grade: D-
Approval18%2 of 11 critics scored it 75 or higher
DivisivenessDividedHow close the scores are: most critics land within 30 points of each other

Based on 11 reviews from outlets we track. Scores run 30 to 81.

By the numbers: John Mayer's best-reviewed album here since Continuum (2006). Scores ran from 30 (Slant) to 81 (Entertainment Weekly).

020406080100Slant: 30The Guardian: 40PopMatters: 60Rolling Stone: 60The Independent: 60Q: 60Los Angeles Times: 63Sputnikmusic: 70AllMusic: 70Mojo: 80Entertainment Weekly: 81 Breakdown 61
The gist
Entertainment Weekly via Wikipedia B- 81
Mojo via Wikipedia 4/5 80
Sputnikmusic via Wikipedia 3.5/5 70
AllMusic via Wikipedia 3.5/5 70
Los Angeles Times via Wikipedia 2.5/4 63
PopMatters 6/10 60 2009 “As a self-professed John Mayer fan who's followed the man's career throughout the many swerving, twisting paths it's taken, I've come to place quite a bit of”
Rolling Stone via Wikipedia 3/5 60
The Independent via Wikipedia 3/5 60
Q via Wikipedia 3/5 60
The Guardian via Wikipedia 2/5 40
Slant via Wikipedia 1.5/5 30

More from John Mayer

See all John Mayer albums ranked

More Rock from around 2009

Would you spin it again?

Be the first to answer. Results show once 3 listeners weigh in.

How the Breakdown works

Every outlet’s score is converted to 0–100 (2/5 is 40, 5.9/10 is 59, a B+ is 88) and averaged. Grades follow the B-Side scale: A is 90–100, B 80–89, C 70–79, D 60–69, F below 60. Approval is the share of critics who scored it 75 or higher; the Breakdown shows green at 75 and up, red below. Divisiveness asks a different question: not how many critics liked it, but how close their scores are to each other. Five critics who all give it 50 are Unanimous, even though none of them liked it. The labels run Unanimous, Broad agreement, Some debate, Divided, and Contentious. Replay rate comes from listeners, not critics: yes counts fully, a few tracks counts half, no counts zero. The gist quotes each outlet’s own summary of its review. Published is the date on the review itself, read from the outlet’s page, so you can see whether an album’s reputation came at release or years later. Scores marked est. come from reviews that publish no number. Scores marked via Wikipedia are archive ratings, mostly for older albums, taken from the “Professional ratings” box on the album’s Wikipedia page (published openly through Wikidata); each links to the original review when we can find it online, and to that Wikipedia entry when we can’t. When an outlet reviewed an album twice, years apart (often for a reissue), both scores count, each labeled with its year.

A-Side marks the critics’ top tier. An album earns it automatically, from its numbers alone: a Breakdown of 90 or higher, from at least 5 reviews, with at least 75% approval. Nobody hands it out and nobody can buy it; if new reviews pull an album below the line, it loses the badge.

Report a problem

Tags:

Leave a Reply