Critics give Sun a B-Side Breakdown of 79 (C+), from 10 reviews at outlets we track. Scores run 60 to 91.
The verdict on Sun
8 of 10 critics liked it, and they mostly agree.
- Highest 91 Entertainment Weekly
- Lowest 60 The Independent
- Career #4 of Cat Power's 7 albums with a Breakdown
- By the numbers Cat Power's best-reviewed album here since The Greatest (2006).
| The gist | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Entertainment Weekly via Wikipediaby Melissa Maerz | A- | 91 | 2012 | |
| Los Angeles Times via Wikipediaby Randall Roberts | 3.5/4 | 88 | 2012 | |
| The A.V. Club via Wikipediaby Josh Modell | B | 85 | 2012 | |
| Spin via Wikipediaby Jessica Hopper | 8/10 | 80 | 2012 | “8SPIN Rating: 8 of 10Release Date: September 04, 2012Label: MatadorChan Marshall insists that her ninth album isn't political, but in America in 2012,” |
| Rolling Stone via Wikipediaby Rob Sheffield | 4/5 | 80 | 2012 | “Check out our album review of Artist's Sun on Rolling Stone.com.” |
| The Guardian via Wikipediaby Caroline Sullivan | 4/5 | 80 | 2012 | “On Chan Marshall's first studio album in six years, she seems to have found some peace, and it's quite moving to hear it, writes Caroline Sullivan” |
| AllMusic via Wikipediaby Heather Phares | 4/5 | 80 | ||
| Pitchfork via Wikipediaby Lindsay Zoladz | 7.9/10 | 79 | 2012 | “Chan Marshall's new album comes 17 years after her debut as Cat Power and six years after her most recent collection of original material. Sun, her first album to feature…” |
| NME via Wikipediaby Leonie Cooper | 7/10 | 70 | 2012 | “To say that Cat Power’s ninth album gets off to a bleak start would be a little bit of an exaggeration. Sure, when alt-folk firebrand Chan Marshall utters “I never…” |
| The Independent via Wikipediaby Andy Gill | 3/5 | 60 | 2012 |
Every Sunday: the week's new albums, scored by the critics. Plus our own reviews when we post them. Free, and one click to leave.
Sun in Cat Power's catalog
How these critics usually treat Cat Power
- Rolling Stone About usual for them1 point above the other critics here. Usually 3 points below on Cat Power's other albums (5).
- NME About usual for them10 points below the other critics here. Usually 7 points below on Cat Power's other albums (6).
- The Guardian About usual for them1 point above the other critics here. Usually 1 point below on Cat Power's other albums (4).
- Pitchfork About usual for themLevel with the other critics here. Usually 2 points below on Cat Power's other albums (5).
- Spin About usual for them1 point above the other critics here. Usually 1 point below on Cat Power's other albums (5).
- AllMusic About usual for them1 point above the other critics here. Usually 2 points above on Cat Power's other albums (6).
More from Cat Power
More Rock from around 2012
Would you spin it again?
Be the first to answer. Results show once 3 listeners weigh in.
How the Breakdown works
Every outlet’s score is converted to 0–100 (2/5 is 40, 5.9/10 is 59, a B+ is 88) and averaged. Grades follow the B-Side scale: A is 90–100, B 80–89, C 70–79, D 60–69, F below 60. Approval is the share of critics who scored it 75 or higher; the Breakdown shows green at 75 and up, red below. Divisiveness asks a different question: not how many critics liked it, but how close their scores are to each other. Five critics who all give it 50 are Unanimous, even though none of them liked it. The labels run Unanimous, Broad agreement, Some debate, Divided, and Contentious. Replay rate comes from listeners, not critics: yes counts fully, a few tracks counts half, no counts zero. The gist quotes each outlet’s own summary of its review. Published is the date on the review itself, read from the outlet’s page, so you can see whether an album’s reputation came at release or years later. Scores marked est. come from reviews that publish no number. Scores marked via Wikipedia are archive ratings, mostly for older albums, taken from the “Professional ratings” box on the album’s Wikipedia page (published openly through Wikidata); each links to the original review when we can find it online, and to that Wikipedia entry when we can’t. When an outlet reviewed an album twice, years apart (often for a reissue), both scores count, each labeled with its year.
A-Side marks the critics’ top tier. An album earns it automatically, from its numbers alone: a Breakdown of 90 or higher, from at least 5 reviews, with at least 75% approval. Nobody hands it out and nobody can buy it; if new reviews pull an album below the line, it loses the badge.









Leave a Reply