Wanderer

Cat Power – Wanderer: B-Side Breakdown 78 (C+) from 10 critic reviews.

Album cover for Wanderer by Cat Power
Released October 5, 2018
Shop on AmazonAs an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.
Cat Power

Wanderer

78
B-Side BreakdownGrade C+ · 10 critics · 80% approval
B-Side Breakdown78Grade: C+
Approval80%8 of 10 critics scored it 75 or higher
DivisivenessBroad agreementHow close the scores are: most critics land within 14 points of each other

Critics give Wanderer a B-Side Breakdown of 78 (C+), from 10 reviews at outlets we track. Scores run 60 to 90.

The verdict on Wanderer

8 of 10 critics liked it, and they mostly agree.

020406080100The Telegraph: 60Pitchfork: 74The A.V. Club: 78Uncut: 80Q: 80Rolling Stone: 80NME: 80The Independent: 80The Guardian: 80AllMusic: 90 Breakdown 78
The gist
AllMusic via Wikipediaby Heather Phares 4.5/5 90
Uncut via Wikipediaby Sharon O'Connell 8/10 80 2018
Q via Wikipediaby Rachel Aroesti 4/5 80 2018
Rolling Stone via Wikipediaby Will Hermes 4/5 80 2018 “Chan Marshall possesses the authority of a seasoned blueswoman on her excellent new LP”
NME via Wikipediaby Jordan Bassett 4/5 80 2018 “On her bluesy 10th album as Cat Power, Chan Marshall honours herself and her own creativity”
The Independent via Wikipediaby Elisa Bray 4/5 80 2018 “Six years after the release of her last LP 'Sun', which saw her veer from soul into electronic territory, her 10th album demonstrates both a newfound sense of calm, and…”
The Guardian via Wikipediaby Alexis Petridis 4/5 80 2018 “Chan Marshall’s latest album adds Auto-Tune, Lana Del Rey and a Rihanna cover version to her folk, blues and American roots music. It’s the work of a woman going her…”
The A.V. Club via Wikipediaby Annie Zaleski C+ 78 2018 “Cat Power’s Wanderer can’t quite find its way”
Pitchfork via Wikipediaby Jayson Greene 7.4/10 74 2018 “On her first album in six years, Chan Marshall roams the many moods of her songwriting with a careful, soft-spoken power.”
The Telegraph via Wikipediaby Neil McCormick 3/5 60 2018

Wanderer in Cat Power's catalog

75What Would the Community Think (1996): 8383The Covers Record (2000): 7373You Are Free (2003): 8080The Greatest (2006): 8383Jukebox (2008): 7070Sun (2012): 7979Wanderer (2018): 7878This one1996
Cat Power's albums by B-Side Breakdown, in release order. Above the dashed line, most critics liked it. Every Cat Power album, ranked

How these critics usually treat Cat Power

  • AllMusic Kinder than usual13 points above the other critics here. Usually level with the others on Cat Power's other albums (6).
  • NME Kinder than usual2 points above the other critics here. Usually 9 points below on Cat Power's other albums (6).
  • Rolling Stone About usual for them2 points above the other critics here. Usually 3 points below on Cat Power's other albums (5).
  • Pitchfork About usual for them5 points below the other critics here. Usually 1 point below on Cat Power's other albums (5).
  • The Guardian About usual for them2 points above the other critics here. Usually 1 point below on Cat Power's other albums (4).

More from Cat Power

See all Cat Power albums ranked

More Indie & Alternative from around 2018

Would you spin it again?

Be the first to answer. Results show once 3 listeners weigh in.

How the Breakdown works

Every outlet’s score is converted to 0–100 (2/5 is 40, 5.9/10 is 59, a B+ is 88) and averaged. Grades follow the B-Side scale: A is 90–100, B 80–89, C 70–79, D 60–69, F below 60. Approval is the share of critics who scored it 75 or higher; the Breakdown shows green at 75 and up, red below. Divisiveness asks a different question: not how many critics liked it, but how close their scores are to each other. Five critics who all give it 50 are Unanimous, even though none of them liked it. The labels run Unanimous, Broad agreement, Some debate, Divided, and Contentious. Replay rate comes from listeners, not critics: yes counts fully, a few tracks counts half, no counts zero. The gist quotes each outlet’s own summary of its review. Published is the date on the review itself, read from the outlet’s page, so you can see whether an album’s reputation came at release or years later. Scores marked est. come from reviews that publish no number. Scores marked via Wikipedia are archive ratings, mostly for older albums, taken from the “Professional ratings” box on the album’s Wikipedia page (published openly through Wikidata); each links to the original review when we can find it online, and to that Wikipedia entry when we can’t. When an outlet reviewed an album twice, years apart (often for a reissue), both scores count, each labeled with its year.

A-Side marks the critics’ top tier. An album earns it automatically, from its numbers alone: a Breakdown of 90 or higher, from at least 5 reviews, with at least 75% approval. Nobody hands it out and nobody can buy it; if new reviews pull an album below the line, it loses the badge.

Report a problem


Discover more from B-Side Guys

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

Tags:

Leave a Reply