Early reviews. Critics give What Matters Most an early B-Side Breakdown of 64 (D), from 7 reviews so far. It will settle as more outlets weigh in.
The verdict on What Matters Most
Most critics weren't won over: 2 of 7 liked it.
- Highest 80 Under the Radar and Mojo
- Lowest 40 Sputnikmusic
- Career #3 of Ben Folds's 3 albums with a Breakdown
- By the numbers Ben Folds's best-reviewed album here since Songs for Silverman (2005).
| The gist | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Under the Radar via Wikipediaby Ian Rushbury | 8/10 | 80 | “It’s been eight long years since Ben Folds’ last studio album, So There, his collaboration with the string ensemble yMusic.” | |
| Mojo via Wikipedia | 4/5 | 80 | 2023 | |
| musicOMH via Wikipediaby John Murphy | 3.5/5 | 70 | 2023 | |
| AllMusic via Wikipediaby Marcy Donelson | 3.5/5 | 70 | 2023 | |
| PopMatters via Wikipediaby Chris Conaton | 6/10 | 60 | 2023 | “Ben Folds' What Matters Most is a mixed bag. He may not be going for the all-out piano rock much this time, but his melodies are as good as ever.” |
| Slant via Wikipediaby Thomas Bedenbaugh | 2.5/5 | 50 | 2023 | “Ben Folds’s ‘What Matters Most’ amounts to a relatively familiar reflection on aging and the passage of time.” |
| Sputnikmusic via Wikipediaby Jack Mancuso | 2/5 | 40 | 2023 | “Ben Folds – What Matters Most review: The Over The Hedge Soundtrack >>>” |
Every Sunday: the week's new albums, scored by the critics. Plus our own reviews when we post them. Free, and one click to leave.
What Matters Most in Ben Folds's catalog
More from Ben Folds
More Pop from around 2023
Would you spin it again?
Be the first to answer. Results show once 3 listeners weigh in.
How the Breakdown works
Every outlet’s score is converted to 0–100 (2/5 is 40, 5.9/10 is 59, a B+ is 88) and averaged. Grades follow the B-Side scale: A is 90–100, B 80–89, C 70–79, D 60–69, F below 60. Approval is the share of critics who scored it 75 or higher; the Breakdown shows green at 75 and up, red below. Divisiveness asks a different question: not how many critics liked it, but how close their scores are to each other. Five critics who all give it 50 are Unanimous, even though none of them liked it. The labels run Unanimous, Broad agreement, Some debate, Divided, and Contentious. Replay rate comes from listeners, not critics: yes counts fully, a few tracks counts half, no counts zero. The gist quotes each outlet’s own summary of its review. Published is the date on the review itself, read from the outlet’s page, so you can see whether an album’s reputation came at release or years later. Scores marked est. come from reviews that publish no number. Scores marked via Wikipedia are archive ratings, mostly for older albums, taken from the “Professional ratings” box on the album’s Wikipedia page (published openly through Wikidata); each links to the original review when we can find it online, and to that Wikipedia entry when we can’t. When an outlet reviewed an album twice, years apart (often for a reissue), both scores count, each labeled with its year.
A-Side marks the critics’ top tier. An album earns it automatically, from its numbers alone: a Breakdown of 90 or higher, from at least 5 reviews, with at least 75% approval. Nobody hands it out and nobody can buy it; if new reviews pull an album below the line, it loses the badge.






Leave a Reply