Critics give Songs for Silverman a B-Side Breakdown of 68 (D+), from 9 reviews at outlets we track. Scores run 40 to 88.
The verdict on Songs for Silverman
4 of 9 critics liked it. A mixed reception.
- Highest 88 Entertainment Weekly
- Lowest 40 PopMatters
- Career #2 of Ben Folds's 3 albums with a Breakdown
- By the numbers Ben Folds's best-reviewed album here since Rockin’ the Suburbs (2001).
| The gist | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Entertainment Weekly via Wikipediaby Chris Willman | B+ | 88 | 2005 | |
| Drowned in Sound via Wikipediaby Julian Ridgway | 8/10 | 80 | 2005 | “Ben Folds is in a lucky position. He makes records only for Ben Folds fans. And after ten years he can probably keep going as long as he wants. But…” |
| AllMusic via Wikipedia | 4/5 | 80 | 2005 | |
| Stylus Magazine via Wikipediaby Dom Passantino | C+ | 78 | 2005 | |
| Rolling Stone via Wikipediaby Brian Hiatt | 3.5/5 | 70 | 2005 | |
| Uncut via Wikipedia | 3/5 | 60 | 2005 | |
| Alternative Press via Wikipedia | 3/5 | 60 | 2005 | |
| Pitchfork via Wikipediaby Marc Hogan | 5.8/10 | 58 | 2005 | “Back when he was Five, Ben Folds made punk rock for wussies. With a goofy drawl and sloppy piano-fisting (SFW …” |
| PopMatters via Wikipediaby Mike Schiller | 4/10 | 40 | 2005 | “Time takes time, you know." "Why you gotta act like you know when you don't know?" "If you can't trust, you can't be trusted." Is this what Ben Folds has” |
Every Sunday: the week's new albums, scored by the critics. Plus our own reviews when we post them. Free, and one click to leave.
Songs for Silverman in Ben Folds's catalog
More from Ben Folds
← Earlier Rockin’ the Suburbs (2001)Later → What Matters Most (2023)
More Rock from around 2005
Would you spin it again?
Be the first to answer. Results show once 3 listeners weigh in.
How the Breakdown works
Every outlet’s score is converted to 0–100 (2/5 is 40, 5.9/10 is 59, a B+ is 88) and averaged. Grades follow the B-Side scale: A is 90–100, B 80–89, C 70–79, D 60–69, F below 60. Approval is the share of critics who scored it 75 or higher; the Breakdown shows green at 75 and up, red below. Divisiveness asks a different question: not how many critics liked it, but how close their scores are to each other. Five critics who all give it 50 are Unanimous, even though none of them liked it. The labels run Unanimous, Broad agreement, Some debate, Divided, and Contentious. Replay rate comes from listeners, not critics: yes counts fully, a few tracks counts half, no counts zero. The gist quotes each outlet’s own summary of its review. Published is the date on the review itself, read from the outlet’s page, so you can see whether an album’s reputation came at release or years later. Scores marked est. come from reviews that publish no number. Scores marked via Wikipedia are archive ratings, mostly for older albums, taken from the “Professional ratings” box on the album’s Wikipedia page (published openly through Wikidata); each links to the original review when we can find it online, and to that Wikipedia entry when we can’t. When an outlet reviewed an album twice, years apart (often for a reissue), both scores count, each labeled with its year.
A-Side marks the critics’ top tier. An album earns it automatically, from its numbers alone: a Breakdown of 90 or higher, from at least 5 reviews, with at least 75% approval. Nobody hands it out and nobody can buy it; if new reviews pull an album below the line, it loses the badge.






Leave a Reply