Critics give Cocoa Sugar a B-Side Breakdown of 80 (B-), from 9 reviews at outlets we track. Scores run 73 to 88.
The verdict on Cocoa Sugar
8 of 9 critics liked it, and they mostly agree.
- Highest 88 The A.V. Club
- Lowest 73 Pitchfork
| The gist | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| The A.V. Club via Wikipediaby Clayton Purdom | B+ | 88 | 2018 | “Ministry, Of Montreal, and more albums to know about this week” |
| Q via Wikipediaby Tom Doyle | 4/5 | 80 | 2018 | |
| Uncut via Wikipediaby Louis Pattison | 8/10 | 80 | 2018 | |
| Mojo via Wikipediaby Andy Cowan | 4/5 | 80 | 2018 | |
| NME via Wikipediaby Jamie Milton | 4/5 | 80 | 2018 | “On their third album ‘Cocoa Sugar’ cements Young Fathers' status as riled-up oddballs determined to reinvent the wheel.” |
| The Independent via Wikipediaby Andy Gill | 4/5 | 80 | 2018 | “Also: Tracey Thorn – Record, Molly Drake – The Tide’s Magnificence, David Kitt – Yous” |
| The Guardian via Wikipediaby Alexis Petridis | 4/5 | 80 | 2018 | “Warp-speed rapping, electronic drones, and lyrics about foie gras manufacture: nothing is too esoteric for the impressive Mercury prize winners” |
| AllMusic via Wikipediaby Andy Kellman | 4/5 | 80 | ||
| Pitchfork via Wikipediaby Sheldon Pearce | 7.3/10 | 73 | 2018 | “The latest from the experimental rap trio is chaotic but sleek, a streamlined presentation of the singular style Young Fathers have crafted.” |
Every Sunday: the week's new albums, scored by the critics. Plus our own reviews when we post them. Free, and one click to leave.
More Indie & Alternative from around 2018
Would you spin it again?
Be the first to answer. Results show once 3 listeners weigh in.
How the Breakdown works
Every outlet’s score is converted to 0–100 (2/5 is 40, 5.9/10 is 59, a B+ is 88) and averaged. Grades follow the B-Side scale: A is 90–100, B 80–89, C 70–79, D 60–69, F below 60. Approval is the share of critics who scored it 75 or higher; the Breakdown shows green at 75 and up, red below. Divisiveness asks a different question: not how many critics liked it, but how close their scores are to each other. Five critics who all give it 50 are Unanimous, even though none of them liked it. The labels run Unanimous, Broad agreement, Some debate, Divided, and Contentious. Replay rate comes from listeners, not critics: yes counts fully, a few tracks counts half, no counts zero. The gist quotes each outlet’s own summary of its review. Published is the date on the review itself, read from the outlet’s page, so you can see whether an album’s reputation came at release or years later. Scores marked est. come from reviews that publish no number. Scores marked via Wikipedia are archive ratings, mostly for older albums, taken from the “Professional ratings” box on the album’s Wikipedia page (published openly through Wikidata); each links to the original review when we can find it online, and to that Wikipedia entry when we can’t. When an outlet reviewed an album twice, years apart (often for a reissue), both scores count, each labeled with its year.
A-Side marks the critics’ top tier. An album earns it automatically, from its numbers alone: a Breakdown of 90 or higher, from at least 5 reviews, with at least 75% approval. Nobody hands it out and nobody can buy it; if new reviews pull an album below the line, it loses the badge.




Leave a Reply