Critics give Fade a B-Side Breakdown of 78 (Keeper), from 9 reviews at outlets we track. Scores run 70 to 88.
The verdict on Fade
9 of 9 critics liked it, and they mostly agree.
- Highest 88 Los Angeles Times
- Lowest 70 Rolling Stone and NME
- Career Tied for #8 of Yo La Tengo's 11 albums with a Breakdown
| The gist | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Los Angeles Times via Wikipediaby Randall Roberts | 3.5/4 | 88 | 2013 | “Yo La Tengo's 'Fade' is honest and catchy” |
| Pitchfork via Wikipediaby Stuart Berman | 8.1/10 | 81 | 2013 | “Deep into their career, Yo La Tengo's sense of craft is intact. Fade, at a tight 10 songs and 46 minutes, is the band's shortest album since 1990's Fakebook; it…” |
| Spin via Wikipediaby Keith Harris | 8/10 | 80 | 2013 | “8SPIN Rating: 8 of 10Release Date: January 15, 2013Label: MatadorWhen Yo La Tengo release their next album three years or so from now, no reviewer will” |
| The Guardian via Wikipediaby Michael Hann | 4/5 | 80 | 2013 | “Yo La Tengo's endlessly varied but always unmistakable sound works terrifically on this pleasingly compact album, writes Michael Hann” |
| AllMusic via Wikipediaby Fred Thomas | 4/5 | 80 | ||
| The A.V. Club via Wikipediaby Tara Bennett | B+ | 75 | 2022 | “The A.V. Club digs deep into film, TV, music, games, books and more.” |
| Entertainment Weekly via Wikipediaby Adam Markovitz | B+ | 75 | 2013 | |
| Rolling Stone via Wikipediaby Will Hermes | 3.5/5 | 70 | 2013 | “Check out our album review of Artist's Fade on Rolling Stone.com.” |
| NME via Wikipediaby Noel Gardner | 7/10 | 70 | 2013 | “Having spent nearly 30 years in a self-sufficient well-liked band is probably fair compensation, but you do wonder if New Jersey indie vets Yo La Tengo are vexed by everyone…” |
Every Sunday: the week's new albums, scored by the critics. Plus our own reviews when we post them. Free, and one click to leave.
Fade in Yo La Tengo's catalog
How these critics usually treat Yo La Tengo
- The Guardian About usual for them3 points above the other critics here. Usually 4 points below on Yo La Tengo's other albums (3).
- Entertainment Weekly About usual for them3 points below the other critics here. Usually 4 points above on Yo La Tengo's other albums (7).
- Rolling Stone About usual for them9 points below the other critics here. Usually 4 points below on Yo La Tengo's other albums (3).
- Pitchfork About usual for them4 points above the other critics here. Usually 5 points above on Yo La Tengo's other albums (6).
- Spin About usual for them3 points above the other critics here. Usually 1 point above on Yo La Tengo's other albums (4).
- AllMusic About usual for them3 points above the other critics here. Usually 4 points above on Yo La Tengo's other albums (10).
More from Yo La Tengo
← Earlier I Am Not Afraid of You and I Will Beat Your Ass (2006)Later → This Stupid World (2023)
More Indie & Alternative from around 2013
Would you spin it again?
Be the first to answer. Results show once 3 listeners weigh in.
How the Breakdown works
Every outlet’s score is converted to 0–100 (2/5 is 40, 5.9/10 is 59) and averaged. A letter grade counts as the star rating it matches across thousands of reviews of the same albums, so a B+ is 75, like four stars, and a B is 65. Verdicts: Heavy Rotation is 85 and up, Keeper 70–84, Mixed Bag 55–69, Back of the Crate below 55. Approval is the share of critics who scored it 70 or higher (7/10, three and a half stars); the Breakdown shows green at 70 and up, red below. Divisiveness asks a different question: not how many critics liked it, but how close their scores are to each other. Five critics who all give it 50 are Unanimous, even though none of them liked it. The labels run Unanimous, Broad agreement, Some debate, Divided, and Contentious. Replay rate comes from listeners, not critics: yes counts fully, a few tracks counts half, no counts zero. The gist quotes each outlet’s own summary of its review. Published is the date on the review itself, read from the outlet’s page, so you can see whether an album’s reputation came at release or years later. Scores marked est. come from reviews that publish no number. Scores marked via Wikipedia are archive ratings, mostly for older albums, taken from the “Professional ratings” box on the album’s Wikipedia page (published openly through Wikidata); each links to the original review when we can find it online, and to that Wikipedia entry when we can’t. When an outlet reviewed an album twice, years apart (often for a reissue), both scores count, each labeled with its year.
A-Side marks the critics’ top tier. An album earns it automatically, from its numbers alone: a Breakdown of 90 or higher, from at least 5 reviews, with at least 75% approval. Nobody hands it out and nobody can buy it; if new reviews pull an album below the line, it loses the badge.










Leave a Reply