Critics give This Stupid World a B-Side Breakdown of 82 (Keeper), from 9 reviews at outlets we track. Scores run 80 to 90.
The verdict on This Stupid World
9 of 9 critics liked it, and they mostly agree.
- Highest 90 musicOMH
- Lowest 80 Uncut, Paste, Exclaim! and 4 more
- Career Tied for #4 of Yo La Tengo's 11 albums with a Breakdown
- By the numbers Yo La Tengo's best-reviewed album here since I Can Hear the Heart Beating as One (1997).
| The gist | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| musicOMH via Wikipediaby Steven Johnson | 4.5/5 | 90 | 2023 | “Sixteenth album sees New Jersey trio reverting to their signature sound, consolidating their position as alternative treasures” |
| Pitchfork via Wikipediaby Grayson Haver Currin | 8.5/10 | 85 | 2023 | |
| Uncut via Wikipediaby Sam Richards | 8/10 | 80 | 2022 | |
| Paste via Wikipediaby Zach Schonfeld | 8.0/10 | 80 | 2023 | |
| Exclaim! via Wikipediaby Nicholas Sokic | 8/10 | 80 | 2023 | |
| Mojo via Wikipediaby Stevie Chick | 4/5 | 80 | 2023 | “Read MOJO’s verdict on the new album from Yo La Tengo, This Stupid World.” |
| The Telegraph via Wikipediaby Cat Woods | 4/5 | 80 | 2023 | |
| Clash via Wikipediaby Benjamin Graye | 8/10 | 80 | 2023 | “Yo La Tengo are back. Their 17th studio album ‘This Stupid World’ is a self produced, mostly recorded live, raw yet tender record that furthers their” |
| AllMusic via Wikipediaby Mark Deming | 4/5 | 80 | 2023 |
Every Sunday: the week's new albums, scored by the critics. Plus our own reviews when we post them. Free, and one click to leave.
This Stupid World in Yo La Tengo's catalog
How these critics usually treat Yo La Tengo
- AllMusic About usual for them2 points below the other critics here. Usually 4 points above on Yo La Tengo's other albums (10).
- Pitchfork About usual for them4 points above the other critics here. Usually 5 points above on Yo La Tengo's other albums (6).
More from Yo La Tengo
More Indie & Alternative from around 2023
Would you spin it again?
Be the first to answer. Results show once 3 listeners weigh in.
How the Breakdown works
Every outlet’s score is converted to 0–100 (2/5 is 40, 5.9/10 is 59) and averaged. A letter grade counts as the star rating it matches across thousands of reviews of the same albums, so a B+ is 75, like four stars, and a B is 65. Verdicts: Heavy Rotation is 85 and up, Keeper 70–84, Mixed Bag 55–69, Back of the Crate below 55. Approval is the share of critics who scored it 70 or higher (7/10, three and a half stars); the Breakdown shows green at 70 and up, red below. Divisiveness asks a different question: not how many critics liked it, but how close their scores are to each other. Five critics who all give it 50 are Unanimous, even though none of them liked it. The labels run Unanimous, Broad agreement, Some debate, Divided, and Contentious. Replay rate comes from listeners, not critics: yes counts fully, a few tracks counts half, no counts zero. The gist quotes each outlet’s own summary of its review. Published is the date on the review itself, read from the outlet’s page, so you can see whether an album’s reputation came at release or years later. Scores marked est. come from reviews that publish no number. Scores marked via Wikipedia are archive ratings, mostly for older albums, taken from the “Professional ratings” box on the album’s Wikipedia page (published openly through Wikidata); each links to the original review when we can find it online, and to that Wikipedia entry when we can’t. When an outlet reviewed an album twice, years apart (often for a reissue), both scores count, each labeled with its year.
A-Side marks the critics’ top tier. An album earns it automatically, from its numbers alone: a Breakdown of 90 or higher, from at least 5 reviews, with at least 75% approval. Nobody hands it out and nobody can buy it; if new reviews pull an album below the line, it loses the badge.










Leave a Reply