Thr!!!er

!!! – Thr!!!er: B-Side Breakdown 72 (C-) from 10 critic reviews.

Album cover for Thr!!!er by !!!
Released April 24, 2013
Shop on AmazonAs an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.
!!!

Thr!!!er

72
B-Side BreakdownGrade C- · 10 critics · 40% approval
B-Side Breakdown72Grade: C-
Approval40%4 of 10 critics scored it 75 or higher
DivisivenessSome debateHow close the scores are: most critics land within 22 points of each other

Critics give Thr!!!er a B-Side Breakdown of 72 (C-), from 10 reviews at outlets we track. Scores run 60 to 90.

The verdict on Thr!!!er

4 of 10 critics liked it. A mixed reception.

020406080100Q: 60Pitchfork: 60Mojo: 60NME: 60Uncut: 70Alternative Press: 70PopMatters: 80Exclaim!: 80The A.V. Club: 85AllMusic: 90 Breakdown 72
The gist
AllMusic via Wikipediaby Tim Sendra 4.5/5 90
The A.V. Club via Wikipediaby Erik Adams B 85 2022 “The A.V. Club digs deep into film, TV, music, games, books and more.”
PopMatters via Wikipediaby Zachary Houle 8/10 80 2013 “It suddenly seems like memorializing Michael Jackson, whatever you may have thought of him as a person, is a cool thing for indie dance bands to do. The”
Exclaim! via Wikipediaby Daniel Sylvester 8/10 80 2013
Uncut via Wikipedia 7/10 70 2013
Alternative Press via Wikipedia 3.5/5 70 2013
Q via Wikipedia 3/5 60 2013
Pitchfork via Wikipediaby Brian Howe 6.0/10 60 2013 “Thirteen years and five LPs into !!!'s output, the mostly well-turned but low-impact Thr!!!er has all the hallmarks of the Brooklyn punk-funk band– wiry, kinked guitars, ropy bass lines, popping…”
Mojo via Wikipedia 3/5 60 2013
NME via Wikipediaby Lucy Jones 6/10 60 2013 “in 2013 are a different prospect to the !!! whose frat-party funk once saw them support Red Hot Chili Peppers. The New Yorkers’ sound has, over five albums, evolved…”

Thr!!!er in !!!'s catalog

75Louden Up Now (2004): 7777Myth Takes (2007): 7878Strange Weather, Isn’t It? (2010): 6666Thr!!!er (2013): 7272This oneAs If (2015): 7373Shake the Shudder (2017): 666620042017
!!!'s albums by B-Side Breakdown, in release order. Above the dashed line, most critics liked it. Every !!! album, ranked

How these critics usually treat !!!

  • Q Harsher than usual13 points below the other critics here. Usually 1 point above on !!!'s other albums (3).
  • Mojo Harsher than usual13 points below the other critics here. Usually 1 point above on !!!'s other albums (3).
  • Pitchfork Harsher than usual13 points below the other critics here. Usually level with the others on !!!'s other albums (5).
  • AllMusic Kinder than usual21 points above the other critics here. Usually 11 points above on !!!'s other albums (5).
  • Alternative Press Harsher than usual2 points below the other critics here. Usually 7 points above on !!!'s other albums (3).
  • NME About usual for them13 points below the other critics here. Usually 6 points below on !!!'s other albums (3).

More from !!!

See all !!! albums ranked

More Rock from around 2013

Would you spin it again?

Be the first to answer. Results show once 3 listeners weigh in.

How the Breakdown works

Every outlet’s score is converted to 0–100 (2/5 is 40, 5.9/10 is 59, a B+ is 88) and averaged. Grades follow the B-Side scale: A is 90–100, B 80–89, C 70–79, D 60–69, F below 60. Approval is the share of critics who scored it 75 or higher; the Breakdown shows green at 75 and up, red below. Divisiveness asks a different question: not how many critics liked it, but how close their scores are to each other. Five critics who all give it 50 are Unanimous, even though none of them liked it. The labels run Unanimous, Broad agreement, Some debate, Divided, and Contentious. Replay rate comes from listeners, not critics: yes counts fully, a few tracks counts half, no counts zero. The gist quotes each outlet’s own summary of its review. Published is the date on the review itself, read from the outlet’s page, so you can see whether an album’s reputation came at release or years later. Scores marked est. come from reviews that publish no number. Scores marked via Wikipedia are archive ratings, mostly for older albums, taken from the “Professional ratings” box on the album’s Wikipedia page (published openly through Wikidata); each links to the original review when we can find it online, and to that Wikipedia entry when we can’t. When an outlet reviewed an album twice, years apart (often for a reissue), both scores count, each labeled with its year.

A-Side marks the critics’ top tier. An album earns it automatically, from its numbers alone: a Breakdown of 90 or higher, from at least 5 reviews, with at least 75% approval. Nobody hands it out and nobody can buy it; if new reviews pull an album below the line, it loses the badge.

Report a problem


Discover more from B-Side Guys

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

Tags:

Leave a Reply