Strange Weather, Isn’t It?

!!! – Strange Weather, Isn’t It?: B-Side Breakdown 68 (D+) from 9 critic reviews.

Album cover for Strange Weather, Isn’t It? by !!!
Released June 23, 2010
Shop on AmazonAs an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.
!!!

Strange Weather, Isn’t It?

68
B-Side BreakdownGrade D+ · 9 critics · 22% approval
B-Side Breakdown68Grade: D+
Approval22%2 of 9 critics scored it 75 or higher
DivisivenessBroad agreementHow close the scores are: most critics land within 18 points of each other

Based on 9 reviews from outlets we track. Scores run 60 to 85.

By the numbers: !!!'s best-reviewed album here since Myth Takes (2007).

020406080100Q: 60Spin: 60Uncut: 60Mojo: 60Pitchfork: 69NME: 70Alternative Press: 70AllMusic: 80The A.V. Club: 85 Breakdown 68
The gist
The A.V. Club via Wikipediaby Noel Murray B 85 2010 “!!!: Strange Weather, Isn’t It?”
AllMusic via Wikipediaby Tim Sendra 4/5 80
NME via Wikipediaby Laura Snapes 7/10 70 2010 “If you’ve ever seen [a]!!![/a] live you may recall lead singer Nic Offer’s flailing, psychedelic worm-like stage presence as a defining feature of their eccentric, otherworldly funk. Tempering this propensity…”
Alternative Press via Wikipedia 3.5/5 70 2010
Pitchfork via Wikipediaby Larry Fitzmaurice 6.9/10 69 2010 “Warp's dance-rock lifers return to basics after the at-times ham-handed, at-times highly effective rockism of 2007's Myth Takes.”
Q via Wikipedia 3/5 60 2010
Spin via Wikipediaby Josh Modell 6/10 60 2010 “Bits of darkness invade !!!'s first album in three years, and it's a dangerous supplement for a band whose foundation is winking, boisterous funk. When”
Uncut via Wikipedia 3/5 60 2010
Mojo via Wikipedia 3/5 60 2010

More from !!!

See all !!! albums ranked

More Indie & Alternative from around 2010

Would you spin it again?

Be the first to answer. Results show once 3 listeners weigh in.

How the Breakdown works

Every outlet’s score is converted to 0–100 (2/5 is 40, 5.9/10 is 59, a B+ is 88) and averaged. Grades follow the B-Side scale: A is 90–100, B 80–89, C 70–79, D 60–69, F below 60. Approval is the share of critics who scored it 75 or higher; the Breakdown shows green at 75 and up, red below. Divisiveness asks a different question: not how many critics liked it, but how close their scores are to each other. Five critics who all give it 50 are Unanimous, even though none of them liked it. The labels run Unanimous, Broad agreement, Some debate, Divided, and Contentious. Replay rate comes from listeners, not critics: yes counts fully, a few tracks counts half, no counts zero. The gist quotes each outlet’s own summary of its review. Published is the date on the review itself, read from the outlet’s page, so you can see whether an album’s reputation came at release or years later. Scores marked est. come from reviews that publish no number. Scores marked via Wikipedia are archive ratings, mostly for older albums, taken from the “Professional ratings” box on the album’s Wikipedia page (published openly through Wikidata); each links to the original review when we can find it online, and to that Wikipedia entry when we can’t. When an outlet reviewed an album twice, years apart (often for a reissue), both scores count, each labeled with its year.

A-Side marks the critics’ top tier. An album earns it automatically, from its numbers alone: a Breakdown of 90 or higher, from at least 5 reviews, with at least 75% approval. Nobody hands it out and nobody can buy it; if new reviews pull an album below the line, it loses the badge.

Report a problem

Tags:

Leave a Reply