Critics give Underwater Moonlight a B-Side Breakdown of 95 (A), from 10 reviews at outlets we track. Scores run 80 to 100.
The verdict on Underwater Moonlight
10 of 10 critics liked it, and they mostly agree.
- Highest 100 Chicago Tribune, Select, Uncut and 2 more
- Lowest 80 NME
- By the numbers The fifth best-reviewed album of 1980 we've tracked.
| The gist | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Chicago Tribune via Wikipediaby Greg Kot | 4/4 | 100 | 2005 | |
| Select via Wikipediaby Andrew Perry | 5/5 | 100 | 2005 | |
| Uncut via Wikipediaby Alastair McKay | 5/5 | 100 | 2005 | |
| Mojo via Wikipedia | 5/5 | 100 | 2005 | |
| AllMusic via Wikipediaby Stephen Thomas Erlewine | 5/5 | 100 | ||
| Entertainment Weekly via Wikipediaby Scott Schinder | A | 95 | 2001 | |
| Spin via Wikipediaby Andrew Hultkrans | 9/10 | 90 | 2010 | |
| The Rolling Stone Album Guide via Wikipediaby J. D. Considine | 4.5/5 | 90 | 2004 | |
| Pitchfork via Wikipediaby Matt LeMay | 9.0/10 | 90 | 2010 | “These reissues forgo liner note-heavy fanfare and supplement Soft Boys' two proper full-lengths with a wealth of illuminating demos, live tracks, and EP cuts.” |
| NME via Wikipediaby Victoria Segal | 8/10 | 80 | 2005 | “A glorious anomaly shaped by the mercurial genius of Robyn Hitchcock, The Soft Boys generated Syd Beefheart psychedelia at a time when it was as hip as a Cumberland reel.…” |
Every Sunday: the week's new albums, scored by the critics. Plus our own reviews when we post them. Free, and one click to leave.
More Rock from around 1980
Would you spin it again?
Be the first to answer. Results show once 3 listeners weigh in.
How the Breakdown works
Every outlet’s score is converted to 0–100 (2/5 is 40, 5.9/10 is 59, a B+ is 88) and averaged. Grades follow the B-Side scale: A is 90–100, B 80–89, C 70–79, D 60–69, F below 60. Approval is the share of critics who scored it 75 or higher; the Breakdown shows green at 75 and up, red below. Divisiveness asks a different question: not how many critics liked it, but how close their scores are to each other. Five critics who all give it 50 are Unanimous, even though none of them liked it. The labels run Unanimous, Broad agreement, Some debate, Divided, and Contentious. Replay rate comes from listeners, not critics: yes counts fully, a few tracks counts half, no counts zero. The gist quotes each outlet’s own summary of its review. Published is the date on the review itself, read from the outlet’s page, so you can see whether an album’s reputation came at release or years later. Scores marked est. come from reviews that publish no number. Scores marked via Wikipedia are archive ratings, mostly for older albums, taken from the “Professional ratings” box on the album’s Wikipedia page (published openly through Wikidata); each links to the original review when we can find it online, and to that Wikipedia entry when we can’t. When an outlet reviewed an album twice, years apart (often for a reissue), both scores count, each labeled with its year.
A-Side marks the critics’ top tier. An album earns it automatically, from its numbers alone: a Breakdown of 90 or higher, from at least 5 reviews, with at least 75% approval. Nobody hands it out and nobody can buy it; if new reviews pull an album below the line, it loses the badge.





Leave a Reply