Based on 11 reviews from outlets we track. Scores run 40 to 100.
By the numbers: The Prodigy's best-reviewed album here since The Fat of the Land (1997). Scores ran from 40 (musicOMH) to 100 (Kerrang!).
| The gist | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kerrang! via Wikipedia | 5/5 | 100 | ||
| XS Noizeby Chris Snoddon | 8/10 | 80 | 2015 | “The Day Is My Enemy follows on the usual Prodigy traits of hyperactive drum patterns and explosive bass crashes intertwined with electronics reminiscent of that pioneered during the early 90's…” |
| The Telegraph via Wikipediaby Helen Brown | 4/5 | 80 | ||
| The Guardian via Wikipediaby Paul MacInnes | 4/5 | 80 | ||
| Mojo via Wikipediaby Andrew Perry | 4/5 | 80 | ||
| NME via Wikipediaby Phil Hebblethwaite | 8/10 | 80 | ||
| Uncut via Wikipedia | 7/10 | 70 | ||
| Pitchfork via Wikipediaby Philip Sherburne | 6.0/10 | 60 | ||
| Rolling Stone via Wikipediaby Christopher R. Weingarten | 3/5 | 60 | ||
| AllMusic via Wikipediaby David Jeffries | 3/5 | 60 | ||
| musicOMHby Sam Shepherd | 2/5 | 40 | 2015 | “From their earliest incarnation as a novelty dance act (Charly Says) to rave legends (Music For The Jilted Generation) and crossover alchemists, The” |
Every Sunday: the week's new albums, scored by the critics. Plus our own reviews when we post them. Free, and one click to leave.
More from The Prodigy
More Electronic from around 2015
Would you spin it again?
Be the first to answer. Results show once 3 listeners weigh in.
How the Breakdown works
Every outlet’s score is converted to 0–100 (2/5 is 40, 5.9/10 is 59, a B+ is 88) and averaged. Grades follow the B-Side scale: A is 90–100, B 80–89, C 70–79, D 60–69, F below 60. Approval is the share of critics who scored it 75 or higher; the Breakdown shows green at 75 and up, red below. Divisiveness asks a different question: not how many critics liked it, but how close their scores are to each other. Five critics who all give it 50 are Unanimous, even though none of them liked it. The labels run Unanimous, Broad agreement, Some debate, Divided, and Contentious. Replay rate comes from listeners, not critics: yes counts fully, a few tracks counts half, no counts zero. The gist quotes each outlet’s own summary of its review. Published is the date on the review itself, read from the outlet’s page, so you can see whether an album’s reputation came at release or years later. Scores marked est. come from reviews that publish no number. Scores marked via Wikipedia are archive ratings, mostly for older albums, taken from the “Professional ratings” box on the album’s Wikipedia page (published openly through Wikidata); each links to the original review when we can find it online, and to that Wikipedia entry when we can’t. When an outlet reviewed an album twice, years apart (often for a reissue), both scores count, each labeled with its year.
A-Side marks the critics’ top tier. An album earns it automatically, from its numbers alone: a Breakdown of 90 or higher, from at least 5 reviews, with at least 75% approval. Nobody hands it out and nobody can buy it; if new reviews pull an album below the line, it loses the badge.










Leave a Reply